Franchising During and After the Pandemic
In his Franchising column, Marc Lieberstein discusses what effect the current COVID‑19 pandemic is having on franchising and what the future will look like afterwards.
May 08, 2020 at 12:30 PM
7 minute read
One thing we have all learned is that during a crisis we Americans usually step up and lend each other a helping hand. Although this article will not go into detail, this author is proud to say that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of examples of both franchisors and franchisees who have donated and are currently donating their goods or services to those in need. But what about the many franchisors and franchisees who cannot donate, are struggling to survive and pay their employees because they are not permitted to provide their goods or services, their supply chains have been interrupted, or their method of operation does not allow for a safe work environment. What does franchising look like during the current COVID‑19 pandemic and afterward?
There is little question that the current pandemic is something that no business, including franchised businesses, could have anticipated. The crisis that franchising is facing now has demonstrated a number of flaws to franchisors/franchisees in their business models, methods of operation, training procedures, supply chains, not to mention deficiencies in the agreement terms which define the relationship between franchisor and franchisees.
According to a QSR April 1, 2020 industry news report, a March 2020 online survey conducted by FranConnect, a provider of franchise management platform solutions, found that, although approximately two-thirds of franchisors continue to sell franchises, 75% of full-service restaurants brands have stopped selling franchises. The survey also showed that personal services brands have been hit the hardest with over half of the respondents indicating they have closed at least half of all of their locations.
It appears that business services and commercial and residential services have not been hurt as badly with more than half of the respondents reporting that they only had to close 10% or less of their locations. Across the board, however, about three-quarters of the respondents indicated they saw a drop of more than 20% in sales. The survey did provide some light at the end of the tunnel in that most businesses expect to return to normal business levels within six months.
So what does the future hold for franchising after the pandemic passes? Here are some thoughts about what franchisors and franchisees might be considering:
Franchise disclosure documents (FDD) and agreements will likely be altered. Franchisors will likely make their FDDs more clear about the impact of the current pandemic and future ones on all kinds of disclosures in the FDD—namely the amount of working capital that may be required, increased insurance expenses, the potential frailty of their financial performance representations for past years and the number of closures. Franchise agreements will also need to be reviewed for how they deal with force majeure and related termination and bankruptcy provisions. Leases will also be scrutinized like never before to level the playing field between landlords and franchise tenants who never imagined a pandemic would impact their lease.
Methods of operation may require substantial overhaul. It is likely that every business will now have to alter how it allows its employees to work—perhaps different groups of employees working on different days. And there will likely be new rules about customer engagement and customer safety, along with new procedures for testing employees and customers. The workplace may require physical design changes to accommodate for safe distancing between employees and customers. Hours of operation may have to change, perhaps shorter hours per day, or fewer days per week. The workplace uniform may change to comply with new health regulations and require masks, gloves, possibly even new types of virus-resistant garments. For some systems, modes of delivery will change in ways that will require additional capital expenditures, such as adding additional capacity for drive-thru or curbside delivery.
Some businesses may implement or enhance methods for the virtual delivery of services to customers. We all heard Governor Gavin Newsom announce that restaurants may have less tables, and be required to use disposable menus. Massive automation of many franchise operational tasks might be the next wave to hit franchising—which will likely lessen workforce requirements. One example could include eliminating wait staff in restaurants. Could food be ordered on a tablet, and then be either picked up by the customer or delivered to the customer by an automated robot? At least one hamburger franchise is already doing something like this. Fine dining may never be the same.
Sophistication and financial fitness for franchisees. For many franchisees it seems as if they were caught completely unprepared financially for this crisis. So many had no money saved in the bank, no "rainy day" fund. Many appear to have been in debt already, or are barely breaking even from month to month, and were in no condition to shut down for a month or two and be able to pay salaries or rent to maintain their businesses. Consequently, we should expect franchisors to be a lot more selective with franchisees going forward, and require higher working capital and financial health to weather such crises in the future. Indeed, similar to the "marketing fund" many franchisors utilize for all franchisees, perhaps franchisors will require franchisees to participate in a new "crisis fund" so they can all have something to tap into for the next crisis, and not be dependent on government bailouts or bank loans.
Development of new franchise businesses. Crisis usually begets innovation. We are already seeing how telemedicine is taking off. It is not difficult to see how new franchise businesses in cleaning, delivery and other home services or stay-at-home businesses are likely to develop. And although travel businesses may continue to flounder for a while, it wouldn't be surprising to see new "safe travel" businesses grow, targeting and servicing customers who want or need to travel without fear. And although dine-in restaurants are also struggling with likely more than a third of such businesses never to open again, restaurants are turning to ghost kitchens and third-party delivery businesses and/or developing their own native delivery services to stay in business.
Supply chain. Another noticeable deficiency in many businesses that arose during this pandemic was the failure of the supply chain many relied on to operate their businesses. It should be clear to franchisors and franchisees that no business should rely on only one source for all their necessary goods or services, and many will likely be employing second source supply agreements to make sure they are not held hostage to the sole supplier that had to close or discontinue services during the pandemic. Indeed, many franchisors may decide to rely on their own local resources to become the supply chain to their franchisees, and not rely on third parties. One would expect more franchisors to employ cutting-edge technology designed to provide better and more sophisticated predictive modeling for their business supply needs going forward, and to charge fees to franchisees for utilizing such technology to become more efficient, better manage inventory, and hopefully realize significant savings.
We are all in this together. I look forward to seeing franchising adapt to the new normal whatever it actually becomes. Stay safe and healthy.
Marc A. Lieberstein is a franchise partner at Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudgment of Partition and Sale Vacated for Failure To Comply With Heirs Act: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250