Franchising During and After the Pandemic
In his Franchising column, Marc Lieberstein discusses what effect the current COVID‑19 pandemic is having on franchising and what the future will look like afterwards.
May 08, 2020 at 12:30 PM
7 minute read
One thing we have all learned is that during a crisis we Americans usually step up and lend each other a helping hand. Although this article will not go into detail, this author is proud to say that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of examples of both franchisors and franchisees who have donated and are currently donating their goods or services to those in need. But what about the many franchisors and franchisees who cannot donate, are struggling to survive and pay their employees because they are not permitted to provide their goods or services, their supply chains have been interrupted, or their method of operation does not allow for a safe work environment. What does franchising look like during the current COVID‑19 pandemic and afterward?
There is little question that the current pandemic is something that no business, including franchised businesses, could have anticipated. The crisis that franchising is facing now has demonstrated a number of flaws to franchisors/franchisees in their business models, methods of operation, training procedures, supply chains, not to mention deficiencies in the agreement terms which define the relationship between franchisor and franchisees.
According to a QSR April 1, 2020 industry news report, a March 2020 online survey conducted by FranConnect, a provider of franchise management platform solutions, found that, although approximately two-thirds of franchisors continue to sell franchises, 75% of full-service restaurants brands have stopped selling franchises. The survey also showed that personal services brands have been hit the hardest with over half of the respondents indicating they have closed at least half of all of their locations.
It appears that business services and commercial and residential services have not been hurt as badly with more than half of the respondents reporting that they only had to close 10% or less of their locations. Across the board, however, about three-quarters of the respondents indicated they saw a drop of more than 20% in sales. The survey did provide some light at the end of the tunnel in that most businesses expect to return to normal business levels within six months.
So what does the future hold for franchising after the pandemic passes? Here are some thoughts about what franchisors and franchisees might be considering:
Franchise disclosure documents (FDD) and agreements will likely be altered. Franchisors will likely make their FDDs more clear about the impact of the current pandemic and future ones on all kinds of disclosures in the FDD—namely the amount of working capital that may be required, increased insurance expenses, the potential frailty of their financial performance representations for past years and the number of closures. Franchise agreements will also need to be reviewed for how they deal with force majeure and related termination and bankruptcy provisions. Leases will also be scrutinized like never before to level the playing field between landlords and franchise tenants who never imagined a pandemic would impact their lease.
Methods of operation may require substantial overhaul. It is likely that every business will now have to alter how it allows its employees to work—perhaps different groups of employees working on different days. And there will likely be new rules about customer engagement and customer safety, along with new procedures for testing employees and customers. The workplace may require physical design changes to accommodate for safe distancing between employees and customers. Hours of operation may have to change, perhaps shorter hours per day, or fewer days per week. The workplace uniform may change to comply with new health regulations and require masks, gloves, possibly even new types of virus-resistant garments. For some systems, modes of delivery will change in ways that will require additional capital expenditures, such as adding additional capacity for drive-thru or curbside delivery.
Some businesses may implement or enhance methods for the virtual delivery of services to customers. We all heard Governor Gavin Newsom announce that restaurants may have less tables, and be required to use disposable menus. Massive automation of many franchise operational tasks might be the next wave to hit franchising—which will likely lessen workforce requirements. One example could include eliminating wait staff in restaurants. Could food be ordered on a tablet, and then be either picked up by the customer or delivered to the customer by an automated robot? At least one hamburger franchise is already doing something like this. Fine dining may never be the same.
Sophistication and financial fitness for franchisees. For many franchisees it seems as if they were caught completely unprepared financially for this crisis. So many had no money saved in the bank, no "rainy day" fund. Many appear to have been in debt already, or are barely breaking even from month to month, and were in no condition to shut down for a month or two and be able to pay salaries or rent to maintain their businesses. Consequently, we should expect franchisors to be a lot more selective with franchisees going forward, and require higher working capital and financial health to weather such crises in the future. Indeed, similar to the "marketing fund" many franchisors utilize for all franchisees, perhaps franchisors will require franchisees to participate in a new "crisis fund" so they can all have something to tap into for the next crisis, and not be dependent on government bailouts or bank loans.
Development of new franchise businesses. Crisis usually begets innovation. We are already seeing how telemedicine is taking off. It is not difficult to see how new franchise businesses in cleaning, delivery and other home services or stay-at-home businesses are likely to develop. And although travel businesses may continue to flounder for a while, it wouldn't be surprising to see new "safe travel" businesses grow, targeting and servicing customers who want or need to travel without fear. And although dine-in restaurants are also struggling with likely more than a third of such businesses never to open again, restaurants are turning to ghost kitchens and third-party delivery businesses and/or developing their own native delivery services to stay in business.
Supply chain. Another noticeable deficiency in many businesses that arose during this pandemic was the failure of the supply chain many relied on to operate their businesses. It should be clear to franchisors and franchisees that no business should rely on only one source for all their necessary goods or services, and many will likely be employing second source supply agreements to make sure they are not held hostage to the sole supplier that had to close or discontinue services during the pandemic. Indeed, many franchisors may decide to rely on their own local resources to become the supply chain to their franchisees, and not rely on third parties. One would expect more franchisors to employ cutting-edge technology designed to provide better and more sophisticated predictive modeling for their business supply needs going forward, and to charge fees to franchisees for utilizing such technology to become more efficient, better manage inventory, and hopefully realize significant savings.
We are all in this together. I look forward to seeing franchising adapt to the new normal whatever it actually becomes. Stay safe and healthy.
Marc A. Lieberstein is a franchise partner at Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPreemptive Litigation: A Potential Approach for a Precise Situation
13 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Medicaid Whistleblowers Awarded $37M Plus Interest
- 2Pfizer Faces Multiple Lawsuits Over Recalled Sickle-Cell Medication
- 3Top 10 Law Firm Videos to Produce in 2025
- 4Elizabeth Cooper of Simpson Thacher on Building Teams in a 'Relationship Business'
- 5Why Hogan Lovells and Perkins Coie Reversed, Will Now Pay Out Special Bonuses to Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.