NY Gov. Cuomo Announces Extension of 'Look Back' Window for Filing Under Child Victims Act
The move is expected to push the deadline for filing claims to the middle of January, instead of August.
May 08, 2020 at 01:25 PM
3 minute read
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Friday said he will extend the "look back" window outlined in the Child Victims Act by five months, giving survivors of child sex abuse more time to file lawsuits over older claims barred by statutes of limitation.
The move is expected to push the deadline for filing claims to the middle of January, instead of this August. The third-term governor said the state is giving more time for survivors to file due to the reduction in court services spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic.
"People need access to the courts to make their claim," he said at a Friday press conference.
Survivors have been banned from filing CVA lawsuits since the state court system instituted a prohibition on new nonessential lawsuits — restrictions put in place as the coronavirus outbreak intensified in New York. Earlier this week, a court system spokesman said they would give survivors an opportunity to file their claims before time ran out on the revival period.
Lawyers and accusers have also expressed deep uncertainty over whether a tolling order from Cuomo, which paused statutes of limitation, would apply to the act's original one-year window.
Friday's announcement is a shift for Cuomo, who had given noncommittal responses on extending the CVA revival period when asked in the past few weeks.
Last week, Cuomo declined to say whether he would support a legislative bill to extend the CVA filing period for one year.
The five-month extension is likely welcomed news to advocates and child victim attorneys. They argue survivors need more time to bring lawsuits, particularly because of the outsized stress triggered by the pandemic.
"It's unreasonable to expect survivors of child sexual abuse to do the emotional and legal work necessary to file CVA lawsuits while simultaneously fighting to pay rent and put food on the table," said state Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, in a statement, pointing to a U.S. unemployment rate above 14%.
Hoylman, chairman of the Judiciary Committee and a sponsor of the extension legislation, said there are survivors who have not come forward and need more time. He reported that many New York counties have less than a handful or no CVA lawsuits.
Opponents argued an extension was unnecessary because the act has been highly publicized and the institutions deserve some sort of finality to the wave of litigation.
Earlier this year, state lawmakers took a pass on extending the CVA's revival window through the state budget. It remains unclear if the Legislature will green light the extension bill before session ends.
READ MORE:
Child Victims Actions May Be Filed Before Window Closes, Despite New Lawsuit Ban, Court Official Says
New York Lawmakers Decline Chance to Extend 'Look-Back Window' in Child Victims Act
Top Cuomo Aide Details Plan to Release Pregnant Prisoners Amid Coronavirus Pandemic
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250