Gleeson Tapped to Argue Against DOJ's Bid to Dismiss Flynn Case
Just days ago, John Gleeson, a partner at Debevoise and former EDNY judge, co-authored an op-ed that noted U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan could reject the Justice Department's motion to dismiss the Flynn case and hand down a sentence.
May 13, 2020 at 07:26 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A federal judge on Wednesday appointed Debevoise & Plimpton partner John Gleeson to oppose the Justice Department's move to dismiss the prosecution of Michael Flynn, the former Trump national security adviser who twice pleaded guilty to lying to investigators about his past communications with the Russian ambassador to the U.S.
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan selected Gleeson a day after signaling his interest in hearing outside views on the Justice Department's sudden abandonment of the Flynn case, a move that renewed criticism that U.S. Attorney General William Barr was intentionally trying to undermine the special counsel's Russia investigation and to interfere to protect an ally to President Donald Trump.
Gleeson, a former federal judge in Brooklyn, was among Barr's critics. Just days ago, he co-authored an op-ed in The Washington Post noting that Sullivan could reject the Justice Department's motion to dismiss the Flynn case and hand down a sentence.
"Flynn's guilt has already been adjudicated," Gleeson wrote in the op-ed with fellow Debevoise partner David O'Neil and Marshall Miller, both former high-ranking Justice Department officials. "So if the court finds dismissal would result in a miscarriage of justice, it can deny the motion, refuse to permit withdrawal of the guilty plea and proceed to sentencing."
Sullivan tasked Gleeson with advising the court whether it "should issue an order to show cause why Mr. Flynn should not be held in criminal contempt for perjury" pursuant to a federal law that gives judges broad authority to punish "misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice."
Flynn's defense team is opposed to allowing outside voices, or amicus curiae, to weigh in on the dismissal, arguing no friend-of-the-court had a place in the high-profile prosecution.
"No further delay should be tolerated or any further expense caused to him and his defense," Flynn's defense lawyers wrote in a brief filed Tuesday. The defense lawyers have urged Sullivan to "immediately" grant the Justice Department's request to dismiss the case.
Barr has refuted broad criticism that he was acting out of bounds when his office stepped in to bring an abrupt end to Flynn's case. Earlier this year, Barr had appointed Jeffrey Jensen, the top federal prosecutor in St. Louis, to scrutinize the case. Barr has said the move to dismiss Flynn's case was made at Jensen's recommendation.
Flynn resigned as Trump's national security adviser within weeks of the inauguration amid questions about whether he misled Vice President Mike Pence about his communications during the transition with Sergey Kislyak, then Russia's ambassador to the United States.
Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 and agreed to cooperate with Robert Mueller III, the special counsel leading the Russia investigation. He apologized in open court for his action.
Flynn had been awaiting sentencing and faced anywhere from probation to six months in prison. In January, represented by new defense counsel, Flynn moved to withdraw his guilty plea. That effort had been pending at the time U.S. Attorney Timothy Shea filed papers asking Sullivan to dismiss the Flynn case with prejudice.
Barr's Justice Department now contends the FBI did not have sufficient grounds to interview Flynn in the first place, an argument that other Justice Department officials contest. A lead prosecutor on the Flynn case, Brandon Van Grack, withdrew from the prosecution shortly before Shea asked Sullivan to dismiss the case. Shea's was on the only name on the motion.
Sullivan said earlier this week he would set a briefing schedule for the filing of any friend-of-the-court briefs. The move effectively slowed down the Justice Department's effort to abandon the prosecution.
Read more:
Flynn's Lawyers Argue 'No Further Delay' as Judge Opens Door to Barr Criticism
Thousands of Ex-Prosecutors Urge Flynn Judge to Question Barr's Move to Drop Case
Covington Clashes With Michael Flynn's Lawyers Over Records Search
'The Record Proves Otherwise': Judge Knocks Down Mike Flynn's 'Ambush' Claims
Michael Flynn, Cooperating with Investigators, Pleads Guilty in Mueller Probe
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAlston & Bird Adds M&A, Private Equity Team From McDermott in New York
4 minute readWeil Lures DOJ Antitrust Lawyer, As Government Lateral Moves Pick Up Before Inauguration Day
5 minute readLooking to the Future of the FDA and Its Impact on Drug Regulation in 2025
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250