Our COVID-19 World Is Like Living in a Bosch Painting
"Particularly relevant today are the people encapsulated in bubbles, remindful that we now live lockdown indoors, and outdoors with faces masked."
May 14, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Hieronymus Bosch, born about 1450 in the Spanish Netherlands, was a strikingly original artist. He expanded the subject matter of painting, which was dominated by religious themes, to include scenes of everyday secular life, what is called genre painting. More startling, his depictions of everyday life included a variety of unexpected figures, drunkards and charlatans, for example, engaged in eccentric behavior—as well as otherworldly figures, aliens, composed of parts of different animals, such as the head of a bird on the body of a frog. He painted nightmares full of devilries, fantasies, oddities and chaos. In short, he often created new species inhabiting new worlds.
The unreality of living in a COVID-19 world, an unprecedented experience that contradicts the reality we have known, is like living in a Bosch painting.
Look at The Garden of Delights (1504) in the Prado, Madrid, one of the most unexpected paintings ever created. The left panel of the triptych is Eden and while it is different from traditional depictions, for example, God here appears as Christ, it nonetheless at first glance looks innocent as a variety of animals frolic in brightly colored nature. Yet, even here, in the exact center of Eden is a fantastical fountain on which an owl—medieval symbol of the devil—stares directly at the creation event, possibly suggesting a sinful future.
Piercing the puzzle of bizarre behaviors in the center panel with any confidence is impossible. Dozens of nude figures engage in nonsensical, preposterous activities: eating or fondling giant strawberry like fruit; riding bareback on a variety of animals; standing, dancing and doing acrobatics on surrealistic architectural structures; and lots of sexual foreplay, lots of it inventive.
Particularly relevant today, however, are the people encapsulated in bubbles, remindful that we now live lockdown indoors, and outdoors with faces masked. And the right panel, Hell, is grotesque, total terror, remindful of the fright we now live with.
Yet, the painting is magnetic. It was prized by the Brussels aristocratic community when painted, and today Prado crowds smother it. And that brings us to some important history—and to an interesting example of pre-trial discovery.
While Americans like to believe we were in 1776 the first colonials in the western world who rebelled for political independence, some 210 years earlier in 1566, the Dutch revolted against Spanish rule. Led by William I, Prince of Orange, aka William the Silent, William also happened to own The Garden, having inherited it from a member of the royal family in Brussels.
The next year, 1567, King Philip II of Spain sent Fernando Alvarez de Toledo, 3rd Duke of Alba, to the Netherlands to crush the Dutch rebellion. Alba established the Council of Troubles d/b/a The Court of Blood, to prosecute the rebels and confiscate their possessions. Alba, who had seen a copy of The Garden upon his arrival in Brussels became obsessed with obtaining the original.
While justified in prosecuting William for sedition, getting possession of The Garden via confiscation was an obvious twofer. But William could not be taken into custody as he was either on the battlefield or hiding—and Alba could not find the painting. Then, in the best tradition of pre-trial discovery, Alba took William's estate manager into custody and tortured him until he revealed the painting's location.
The denouement: Alba got The Garden and carried it back to Spain when he was discharged in 1573; the Netherlands got its independence eight years later; and we today delight in looking at The Garden of Delights and are remindful that Bosch also saw the world turned upside down. See Bosch & Bruegel by Joseph Leo Koerner, Princeton University Press, 2016.
David Lenefsky practices law in Manhattan. He is a resource in art history for The Young President's Organization. The author is grateful to Matthew F. Cooper, J.S.C., New York County, for suggesting the subject matter of this essay; needless to say, Judge Cooper is not responsible for its content.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250