Changes to Bail Law Projected to Increase NYC's Pretrial Jail Population, New Report Says
Even though it's been amended, New York's bail law will still sharply cut down on pretrial detention compared to the pre-reform era, the report says.
May 15, 2020 at 05:25 PM
3 minute read
A trimmed-back bail reform law is projected to increase New York City's pretrial jail population by about 16%, according to a new report from the Center for Court Innovation.
Even though it's been amended, New York's bail law will still sharply cut down on pretrial detention compared to the pre-reform era, the report says.
"Putting to one side (for now) the emergency COVID-19 population reductions, we project the April 2020 amendments will increase the city's pretrial jail population by approximately 15 to 16% relative to the new baseline of 3,000," according to the report.
Earlier this year, through a budget deal, New York lawmakers green-lighted changes to a landmark bail reform law that eliminated cash bail for most low-level and nonviolent felony cases. The changes came only a few months after the bail law went into effect.
The amendments to the bail law added a string of crimes to the list of bail-eligible offenses. Those crimes included aggravated vehicular assault and grand larceny in the first degree.
Under the changes, the ability to set bail also extended to crimes that have caused the death of another person. The bill also afforded judges more power to set bail on repeat offenders.
Supporters of the original bail reform law argued the old system was unfair to poor people, leaving them to languish in pretrial detention if they could not pay bail.
Prosecutors and law enforcement officials lambasted the bail reform law, saying it jeopardized public safety and did not provide enough judicial discretion.
The amended bail law will go into effect this summer, according to the report from the Center for Court Innovation.
The amended law, according to the report, also specified additional non-monetary conditions that might be imposed pretrial.
Court data analyzed by the nonprofit think tank showed that about 88% of New York City criminal arraignments would not have been eligible for remand or bail, if the original bail reform law was in effect in 2019.
That metric drops to about 84% with this year's trims to the bail law, according to the report.
"The amendments still allow for an estimated 30% reduction in the city's jail population when compared to the absence of any reform," according to the report.
Overall, recent data from the state's Division of Criminal Justice Services shows that jail populations statewide have plummeted in the last year. There was a 44% drop in the state's total jail population from April 2019 to April 2020, according to the state figures.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump Nominates Ex-SEC Chief Jay Clayton to Helm Southern District of New York US Attorney's Office
- 2Steward Health CEO Saga Signals Escalation of Coercive Congressional Oversight Against Private Parties
- 3'They Should Have Tried to Negotiate': Jury Finds Against Insurer
- 4Expert Testimony Regarding Sexual Grooming
- 5Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Law Firms Shrink From 'Performative' Statements
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250