NY Courts to Lift Ban on New 'Nonessential' Lawsuits for Downstate Counties
Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks made the announcement Wednesday in a memorandum to trial court judges.
May 20, 2020 at 03:27 PM
3 minute read
The state Unified Court System is restoring the filing of new nonessential lawsuits for New York City and downstate counties starting Monday, according to its chief administrative judge.
Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks made the announcement Wednesday in a memorandum to trial court judges. He says new matters, previously classified as "nonessential," will be able to be filed electronically for the five New York City counties and the Long Island counties of Nassau and Suffolk, along with Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, Sullivan, UIster and Westchester counties.
For the state court system, the move is the most significant step forward in expanding court access since the system postponed all "nonessential" services in March.
"This expanded use of NYSCEF will permit a significant broadening of civil litigation in a manner that continues to ensure the highest measure of health and safety to judges, court personnel and the public," Marks wrote in the memorandum.
"In recognition of the continued curtailment of in-court activities of court personnel and the public — and in contrast to the usual practice in consensual e-filing matters — this restoration of NYSCEF usage will be limited to cases in which represented parties file and serve all papers electronically," he said in the memorandum.
Attorneys have not been able to file new "nonessential" lawsuits in downstate counties due to tight restrictions imposed by the court system in March as the COVID-19 crisis intensified in New York. With the restrictions extending more than two months, there's expected to be a backlog of state court cases.
Henry Greenberg, president of the New York State Bar Association, said the news is an answered prayer for litigators.
"This is a tremendous milestone in the expansion of New York's virtual courts and great news for litigators and the public," he said in a statement. "It is a giant leap in our return to a new normal."
In upstate New York, some counties are already accepting new nonessential lawsuits after their regions met state-mandated reopening benchmarks. Regions that received the green light from state officials were able to move into phase one of the state's reopening plan, which allows construction, agriculture and manufacturing companies to bring back their operations.
The state court system has also announced that the ban on new nonessential lawsuits would be lifted next week in courts within the Capital Region. Judges in the region and their personal staff will also be allowed to return to their courthouses for work starting Tuesday, according to the court system.
READ MORE:
'It Will Look Different': SDNY's Phased Reopening to Include 'Physical Changes,' Continued Remote Hearings
The Reopening of New York Courts
Capital Region Gets Nod to Reopen From Cuomo Administration
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibbons Reps Asylum Seekers in $6M Suit Over 2018 ‘Inhumane’ Immigration Policy
- 2DC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
- 3Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, so Why Were US Numbers Flat?
- 4In Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
- 5Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250