Sale of Collateral Not a Foreclosure, Can Move Forward Despite Pandemic, Manhattan Judge Rules
If Cuomo had intended to prohibit such sales, he would have "explicitly provided" for the UCC in his order, just as he did with several laws affected by the pandemic, Justice Frank Nervo wrote.
May 20, 2020 at 06:08 PM
3 minute read
A Manhattan Supreme Court justice ruled in favor of the lender in a Midtown real estate matter Monday, finding that Gov. Andrew Cuomo's executive order suspending commercial foreclosures does not apply to the planned sale of collateral under the Uniform Commercial Code.
If Cuomo had intended to prohibit such sales, he would have "explicitly provided" for the UCC in his order, just as he did with several laws affected by the pandemic, Justice Frank Nervo wrote.
"Defendant … notes a foreclosure to be a judicial proceeding, whereas the proposed (and Noticed) sale addresses disposition of collateral pursuant to the UCC, a non-judicial proceeding," Nervo wrote. "The Court concurs with the defendant."
The plaintiff in the case is a single-purpose entity indirectly owned by Hidrock Properties, which is developing a 31-story Hilton timeshare with ground-floor retail at 12-14 East 48th Street, according to court documents. A spokeswoman for the plaintiff's attorneys, Allen & Overy, declined to comment Wednesday.
The plaintiff sued in late April to stop the auction of collateral by the holder of its junior mezzanine loan, arguing that the auction had been improperly noticed and would be a "commercially unreasonable fire sale" at the shuttered law offices of the lender's attorneys, Paul Hastings.
James Gabriel, a partner in the lending organization, wrote in a May 18 affidavit that the auction, scheduled for May 1, would have happened virtually and not at the closed offices. He argued that notice was published several times in The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times and garnered interest from at least 10 potential bidders.
Gabriel, who is a partner in the real estate private equity investment firm 54 Madison Partners, according to emails included in court papers, wrote that the plaintiff owed at least $6.9 million on the junior mezzanine loan as of May 18.
The auction of collateral is scheduled to proceed virtually on June 1, Paul Hastings partners Peter Olsen and Jodi Kleinick said in a statement Wednesday.
"We and our client were extremely pleased that the court resolved this matter quickly and determined that the mezzanine lender was entitled to proceed with the UCC disposition of collateral now," they said. "We have rescheduled the public auction for June 1 at 10 a.m. and will be conducting the auction via Webex and teleconference."
In addition to lifting a temporary restraining order, Nervo ordered that the case should no longer be categorized as essential under Cuomo's order prioritizing essential matters in the courts.
"Plaintiff's anticipation of economic damage resulting from the noticing, the manner, or timing of the sale, particularly in light of the current economic shutdown and restrictions on travel as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, is merely speculative," Nervo wrote.
The case was captioned 1258 Assoc Mezz II LLC v 12E48 Mezz II LLC.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDeposing Former Mayor Bill de Blasio; Misrepresentations To Induce Investment: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Doctrine of ‘Practical Location,’ Breach of a Commercial Lease: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
US Supreme Court Justices Pass on Landlord Challenge to NY Rent Stabilization
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250