Most people sign up for social media platforms without taking the time or effort to read the platform’s Terms of Use. A recent decision from the Southern District of New York illustrates why this may be a risky proposition for professional photographers, artists or anyone who values their creative intellectual property. The decision in Sinclair v. Ziff Davis and Mashable, 18-CV-790 (KMB) by District Judge Kimba M. Wood considered a claim by a photojournalist, Stephanie Sinclair, arising from an article posted on the news website Mashable, which included one of Sinclair’s photographs without a direct license or payment to her.

As a noted professional photographer, Sinclair maintained her own searchable website to showcase her photographs to potential customers. She also had an account on Instagram, one of the world’s most popular platform for photo and video-sharing. Sinclair’s photograph, titled “Child, Bride, Mother/Child Marriage in Guatemala” (the photograph) was the source of the dispute. The photograph was posted by Sinclair on Instagram and her account was set on the “public” mode, meaning any user on Instagram could view Sinclair’s postings.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]