The Reopening of New York Courts
As regions of New York State move toward reopening, so does the state's court system. But, it appears for now that the extent and timing of the reopening will differ around the State.
May 20, 2020 at 09:45 AM
9 minute read
The following is adapted from a Nixon Peabody litigation alert.
As regions of New York State move toward reopening, so does the state's court system. But, it appears for now that the extent and timing of the reopening will differ around the State. On March 22, 2020, the chief administrative judge of the courts of the state entered an administrative order directing that no paper or electronic filings would be accepted in any matter outside the scope of certain limited "essential matters." Since that time, the courts have gradually expanded virtual operations, allowing filings in pending matters. Now, significantly, for the first time since March 22, 2020, New York state courts in some locations will begin accepting the filing of new lawsuits, regardless of whether they meet the definition of "essential matters."
New York is divided into thirteen judicial districts, and while the chief administrative judge for New York State has issued guidance on preliminary steps all courts are taking to reopen, the timing and route to reopening will occur on a district-by-district basis. Starting Monday, May 18, 2020, six judicial districts—the Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth—continued the process of reopening, corresponding roughly to the Finger Lakes, North Country, Southern Tier, and Mohawk Valley regions of the state that have been cleared by Governor Andrew Cuomo to move to Phase I of New York State's broader Reopening Plan.
The Seventh Judicial District, covering most of the Finger Lakes region, including Rochester, is the first of New York's judicial districts to provide specific plans for further reopening, including allowing filing of new non-essential actions and limited access to the courthouse. On May 13, 2020, Justice Craig Doran, the chief administrative judge for the Seventh Judicial District, issued Administrative Order 028 announcing that judicial and certain clerical staff are returning to the courthouses and that new non-essential cases, including personal injury claims, contract disputes, and similar civil actions, may now be electronically filed, starting Monday, May 18, 2020. On May 15, 2020, the chief administrative judge of the New York State Unified Court System also issued Administrative Order 111/2020 further detailing the filing of new actions and the counties impacted.
Given the regional differences in plans for reopening across New York's judicial districts, our original alert will be updated to reflect the current status of the courts in each judicial district. The map located here will also be updated to provide a summary of this information (Key: Yellow: new actions can be commenced for "essential matters" only; Green: new actions can be commenced for both "essential" and "nonessential" matters.)
Background
As discussed in our previous alerts, New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo executed a series of increasingly restrictive executive orders (EOs) to encourage "social distancing" in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including EO 202.8 (the PAUSE Order), which implemented the "New York State on PAUSE (Policies Assure Uniform Safety for Everyone) initiative, requiring closure of all non-essential on-site businesses, and suspending all state-law-based statutes of limitation through June 6, 2020.
Consistent with these directives, the chief administrative judge of the New York State Unified Court System also issued administrative orders (AOs) and guidance limiting both paper and electronic filings to "essential matters," which are defined to include, among other things, certain criminal matters, some family court matters, civil/housing matters related to landlord lockouts and serious code violations, and supreme court matters related to the Mental Hygiene Law and certain emergency applications.
Since that time, the state courts have gradually expanded operations, first allowing virtual conferencing to assist in settling cases and then, on May 4, 2020, allowing new filings in pending non-essential matters. Now, courts around New York are moving toward further reopening on a district-by-district basis. On May 13, 2020, the chief administrative judge of the New York State Unified Court System issued a press release outlining the 30 upstate counties that have met Governor Andrew Cuomo's established safety benchmarks and that will reopen for filing of new cases beginning May 18, 2020. Those counties include: Broome, Chemung, Chenango, Delaware, Schuyler, Steuben, Tioga, Tompkins, Genesee, Livingston, Monroe, Ontario, Orleans, Seneca, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates, Fulton, Herkimer, Montgomery, Oneida, Otsego, and Schoharie. Beginning May 20, 2020, the following counties will also reopen for new cases and filings: Clinton, Essex, Franklin, Hamilton, Jefferson, Lewis, and St. Lawrence.
First Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, the First Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening, and no supreme courts within the First Judicial District are accepting new cases or filings in nonessential matters.
Second Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, the Second Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening, and no supreme courts within the Second Judicial District are accepting new case filings in nonessential matters.
Third Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, only Schoharie County Supreme Court is set to reopen for new case filings on May 18, 2020. The Third Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening for nonessential matters.
Fourth Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, Fulton and Montgomery counties' supreme courts are set to reopen for new case filings on May 18, 2020, and Clinton, Essex, Franklin, Hamilton, and St. Lawrence counties' supreme courts are set to reopen for new case filings on May 20, 2020. The Fourth Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening for nonessential matters.
Fifth Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, Herkimer and Oneida counties' supreme courts are set to reopen for new case filings on May 18, 2020, and Jefferson and Lewis counties' supreme courts are set to reopen for new case filings on May 20, 2020. The Fifth Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening for nonessential matters.
Sixth Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, Broome, Chemung, Chenango, Delaware, Schuyler, Tioga, Tompkins, and Otsego counties' supreme courts are set to reopen for new case filings on May 18, 2020. The Sixth Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening for nonessential matters.
Seventh Judicial District
As noted above, on May 13, 2020, the Seventh Judicial issued Administrative Order 028, providing that new actions and filings in litigation for personal injury claims, contract disputes, and similar civil items will now be permitted in all counties' supreme courts—with the exception of Cayuga County—starting Monday, May 18, 2020. Notably, only electronic filings are permitted for now, so if the court does not allow for electronic filings currently, new actions are not permitted until paper filings are permitted, starting May 25, 2020.
Significantly, virtual hearings will continue. And, deadlines in currently pending matters that occurred on or after March 17, 2020, have been extended for a period of 90 days from the date of the stated deadline, unless the assigned judge has issued an order setting other dates, or the parties have agreed to proceed. Some of the other highlights from the AO include:
- All TROs issued that have expired or are due to expire on or after March 19, 2020, "shall be extended under the same terms and conditions until the date the matter is re-calendared, unless the order is sooner terminated or modified by a judge or justice of the court that issued the order";
- Pending eviction proceedings continue to be stayed, consistent with Executive Orders 202.8, 202.14, and 202.28 issued by Governor Andrew Cuomo, which provide that there shall be no enforcement of an eviction or foreclosure proceeding against any resident or commercial tenant; and
- Default judgments are now permitted, but only if the default occurred prior to March 16, 2020.
The AO also included specific guidance for civil matters in supreme court, as well as cases in superior court criminal, family court, surrogate's court, city court, and town and village court.
The Seventh Judicial District also issued its guidelines for Phase I of the Return to In-Person Operations Plan, to commence on May 18, 2020, providing for limited foot traffic in the courthouses within the district, with use of masks, gloves, and spatial distancing.
Eighth Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, Genesee, Orleans, and Wyoming counties' supreme courts are set to reopen for new case filings on May 18, 2020. The Eighth Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening for nonessential matters.
Ninth Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, the Ninth Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening, and no supreme courts within the Ninth Judicial District are accepting new case filings in nonessential matters.
Tenth Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, the Tenth Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening, and no supreme courts within the Tenth Judicial District are accepting new case filings in nonessential matters.
Eleventh Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, the Eleventh Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening, and no supreme courts within the Eleventh Judicial District are accepting new case filings in nonessential matters.
Twelfth Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, the Twelfth Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening, and no supreme courts within the Twelfth Judicial District are accepting new case filings in nonessential matters.
Thirteenth Judicial District
As of May 15, 2020, the Thirteenth Judicial District has not yet outlined a district-wide plan for reopening, and no supreme courts within the Thirteenth Judicial District are accepting new case filings in nonessential matters.
Richard A. McGuirk and Carolyn G. Nussbaum are partners, and Zachary C. Osinski and Eric M. Ferrante are associates, at Nixon Peabody.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Second Amendment Does Not Offer Right to Obtain Firearms 'On Demand'
Decision of the Day: Firm, Founding Partner Disqualified From Probate Case Amid Investigation on Undue Influence Claim
Decision of the Day: District Judge Vacates Magistrate's Ruling to Disqualify Prosecutors in Kidnapping Case
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250