Retail Restructurings Related to COVID-19 Shutdowns
In his Bankruptcy Update column, Edward E. Neiger explores the latest wave of restructurings in the retail sector, including J. Crew, Neiman Marcus and Stage Stores, as the industry falters under the weight of COVID-19 pandemic shutdowns.
May 21, 2020 at 12:00 PM
5 minute read
This issue of the Bankruptcy Update focuses on the latest wave of restructurings in the retail sector, including J. Crew, Neiman Marcus and Stage Stores, as the industry falters under the weight of COVID-19 pandemic shutdowns.
Crew Group
On May 4, 2020, J. Crew Group Inc. and affiliated debtors filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia becoming the first major retailer to commence bankruptcy proceedings in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic. J. Crew Group (Bankr. E.D. Va. 20-32185).
Originally founded as a catalog retailer, J. Crew opened its first store in 1989 and eventually grew its footprint to 181 J. Crew stores, 140 Madewell stores and 170 factory stores, along with an e-commerce platform. In 2011, TPG Capital and Leonard Green & Partners LP purchased the company for $3 billion. Subsequently, in 2019 J. Crew, contemplated a restructuring that would spin off the Madewell brand to a separate company, though these plans appeared to be abandoned as Madewell is slated to remain part of the company under the envisioned bankruptcy plan.
To fund operations under Chapter 11, the debtors secured a $400 million debtor-in-possession financing facility to be provided by prepetition lenders including Anchorage Capital Group, CSO Capital Partners and Davidson Kempner Capital Management.
The debtors will seek to implement the terms of a transaction support agreement entered into with approximately 71% of the company's prepetition term loan lenders and holders of approximately 78% of their intellectual property company notes and their financial sponsors. The transaction support agreement contemplates a financial restructuring whereby around $1.65 billion of the company's prepetition debt will be converted to equity under a plan of reorganization.
Neiman Marcus
On May 7, 2020, Neiman Marcus Group Ltd. and affiliated debtors filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. Neiman Marcus Group Ltd. (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 20-32519)
The company, comprised of Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman locations along with an e-commerce platform, started as a single store operation in Texas over a century ago and grew to 67 stores across the United States.
The bankruptcy filing was widely anticipated as the retailer was battered by store closures necessitated by the coronavirus pandemic and related countermeasures. The closures compounded pressures the retailer already faced as a result of the general shift away from brick-and-mortar to online retail channels and changes in consumer demographics.
The retailer entered bankruptcy armed with a restructuring support agreement entered into with a group of major creditors including holders of over 77% of the debtors' extended term loans, over 99% of the debtors' second-lien notes, and over 69% of the debtors' third-lien notes. The restructuring support agreement sets out the key terms of a forthcoming plan of reorganization, which will seek to deleverage the debtors' balance sheet by around $4 billion and transfer an 87.5% equity stake in the reorganized debtors to holders of 2019 term loan claims.
To fund operations during Chapter 11 the debtors secured a $675 million debtor-in-possession financing facility from their existing term loan lenders and noteholders, with $275 million made available upon entry of an interim order approving DIP financing on May 8, 2020. Access to financing was approved over objections of Marble Ridge Capital, a significant prepetition unsecured noteholder that was engaged in prepetition litigation with the debtors and their equity sponsors Ares Management and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board. Signaling further litigation, Marble Ridge raised questions regarding propriety of certain prepetition transactions involving the debtors' redesignation of their MyTheresa e-commerce assets into certain unrestricted subsidiaries and subsequent transfer to the Neiman Marcus parent.
Stage Stores
On May 10, 2020, Stage Stores and affiliated debtors filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. Stage Stores (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 20-32564).
Stage Stores was founded in 1988 following the acquisition of the Palais Royal and Bealls retail chains. Following a period of rapid expansion, the company filed Chapter 11 proceedings in 1999. After emerging from bankruptcy, the company acquired the Peebles and Goody's names. Subsequently, in 2017 the company acquired Gordmans via a §363 sale in Gordmans' own Chapter 11 proceeding.
The debtors implemented an operational reorganization in late 2019 by moving to an off-price model. Initially, the debtors converted 82 stores to the new model and planned to convert 220 additional locations when the pandemic forced them to shutter over 700 stores leading to a liquidity crisis. The debtors anticipate opening 550 of their stores by May 15, 2020, another 67 by May 28, 2020 and the remaining stores by June 4, 2020.
The debtors are not seeking approval of any DIP facility at this time and will seek to rely on their prepetition secured lenders' cash collateral to fund their operations under Chapter 11.
The debtors intend to utilize the Chapter 11 proceeding to effectuate an orderly liquidation of their inventory while simultaneously exploring a going concern sale for all or a subset of their stores.
Edward E. Neiger is a co-managing partner at ASK LLP, a national law firm focusing on bankruptcy law. Marianna Udem, partner at ASK LLP, assisted in drafting this column. Mr. Neiger can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Are Dominated by Small Cap Listings
The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
7 minute readA Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
13 minute readShifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250