Cuomo Softens COVID-19 Anti-Gathering Rule Amid NYCLU Lawsuit
The new executive order allows gatherings of up to 10 people, if they practice social distancing and follow "cleaning and disinfection protocols required by the Department of Health."
May 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo did away with New York's near total ban on gatherings Friday, the same day he faced a legal challenge from the New York Civil Liberties Union over exceptions made to the rule.
The new executive order now allows gatherings of up to 10 people, if they practice social distancing and follow "cleaning and disinfection protocols required by the Department of Health." A previous order prohibited nonessential gatherings of any size.
New York state, which has recorded more than 23,100 COVID-19 deaths, issued a ban on nonessential gatherings back in March as the state's coronavirus crisis dramatically escalated. Cuomo relaxed those rules in an executive order this week, allowing for gatherings of up to 10 people for religious services and Memorial Day ceremonies.
That move sparked a legal challenge from NYCLU, which argued the exceptions violated the First Amendment. It was filed Friday in the federal Southern District of New York.
The lawsuit was on the behalf of Brooklyn resident Linda Bouferguen, who was arrested twice while protesting the shutdown of economic activity. She plans to take part in a small demonstration Saturday too, according to the lawsuit.
Christopher Dunn, legal director at NYCLU, issued a statement saying he was glad to see Cuomo "reverse course on his executive order," adding that the right to exercise free speech and protest is the foundation of other liberties.
"During a crisis is exactly when we need to be most vigilant about protecting it," he said in the statement. "Health experts, elected officials, and police officers all agree that people can be outside safely while practicing social distancing, and it's critical that lawmakers create guidelines and direct law enforcement uniformly."
Late Wednesday, NYCLU communicated its concerns about the exceptions to the anti-gathering rule to a senior member of Cuomo's office, according to the lawsuit. The next day, Cuomo signed the executive order allowing the exceptions.
"The NYCLU urged the office to amend the ban on gatherings to allow all First Amendment events of 10 or fewer people observing social distancing," according to the lawsuit.
When asked Saturday if he felt pressure to change the state's anti-gathering rule due to the NYCLU lawsuit, Cuomo responded that he "didn't even know about a lawsuit on this one."
As New York moves through a phased-in economic reopening plan, Cuomo said that permitting gatherings of up to 10 people theoretically should not affect the state's infection rate or its ability to reopen businesses.
"It depends on how people act. You [can] have a safe gathering of 10 people. You can also have a wholly unsafe gathering of 10 people. You can have an unsafe gathering of three people," Cuomo said.
The third-term governor cautioned that people need to weigh gatherings with the risk of infection.
"If you don't have to be with a group of 10 people, don't be with a group of 10 people," he said, arguing the executive order should not be seen as an open season for parties.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 2Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
- 3How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 4Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 5Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250