Cuomo Softens COVID-19 Anti-Gathering Rule Amid NYCLU Lawsuit
The new executive order allows gatherings of up to 10 people, if they practice social distancing and follow "cleaning and disinfection protocols required by the Department of Health."
May 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM
3 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo did away with New York's near total ban on gatherings Friday, the same day he faced a legal challenge from the New York Civil Liberties Union over exceptions made to the rule.
The new executive order now allows gatherings of up to 10 people, if they practice social distancing and follow "cleaning and disinfection protocols required by the Department of Health." A previous order prohibited nonessential gatherings of any size.
New York state, which has recorded more than 23,100 COVID-19 deaths, issued a ban on nonessential gatherings back in March as the state's coronavirus crisis dramatically escalated. Cuomo relaxed those rules in an executive order this week, allowing for gatherings of up to 10 people for religious services and Memorial Day ceremonies.
That move sparked a legal challenge from NYCLU, which argued the exceptions violated the First Amendment. It was filed Friday in the federal Southern District of New York.
The lawsuit was on the behalf of Brooklyn resident Linda Bouferguen, who was arrested twice while protesting the shutdown of economic activity. She plans to take part in a small demonstration Saturday too, according to the lawsuit.
Christopher Dunn, legal director at NYCLU, issued a statement saying he was glad to see Cuomo "reverse course on his executive order," adding that the right to exercise free speech and protest is the foundation of other liberties.
"During a crisis is exactly when we need to be most vigilant about protecting it," he said in the statement. "Health experts, elected officials, and police officers all agree that people can be outside safely while practicing social distancing, and it's critical that lawmakers create guidelines and direct law enforcement uniformly."
Late Wednesday, NYCLU communicated its concerns about the exceptions to the anti-gathering rule to a senior member of Cuomo's office, according to the lawsuit. The next day, Cuomo signed the executive order allowing the exceptions.
"The NYCLU urged the office to amend the ban on gatherings to allow all First Amendment events of 10 or fewer people observing social distancing," according to the lawsuit.
When asked Saturday if he felt pressure to change the state's anti-gathering rule due to the NYCLU lawsuit, Cuomo responded that he "didn't even know about a lawsuit on this one."
As New York moves through a phased-in economic reopening plan, Cuomo said that permitting gatherings of up to 10 people theoretically should not affect the state's infection rate or its ability to reopen businesses.
"It depends on how people act. You [can] have a safe gathering of 10 people. You can also have a wholly unsafe gathering of 10 people. You can have an unsafe gathering of three people," Cuomo said.
The third-term governor cautioned that people need to weigh gatherings with the risk of infection.
"If you don't have to be with a group of 10 people, don't be with a group of 10 people," he said, arguing the executive order should not be seen as an open season for parties.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250