Mid-Hudson Region Cleared to Reopen Parts of Economy
It remains unclear when state officials will allow regions to move to phase two of the reopening scheme, which would allow law firms to open up their offices.
May 26, 2020 at 01:32 PM
3 minute read
Courts in the Mid-Hudson region and on Long Island will return to in-person operations this week, New York's court system said Tuesday.
The state's Unified Court System reported that courts in Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland and Westchester counties will get back to in-person operations starting Wednesday, which will be followed on Thursday by Sullivan and Ulster counties and Suffolk and Nassau counties on Friday.
The move comes as state officials have given the Mid-Hudson region the OK to reopen parts of its economy.
Construction, manufacturing and wholesale trade operations closed due to New York's stay-at-home measures were able to reopen Tuesday in the Mid-Hudson region.
Those companies are able to open back up under phase one of New York's gradual reopening plan. Phase two includes the reopening of "professional services," which is expected to allow law firms to return to in-office work.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Long Island is on track to enter the first phase on Wednesday. Officials will be monitoring coronavirus figures in all regions to watch out for any case clusters.
"You see a little movement, you pounce on it. Find out what it is, explore it and resolve it," he said.
Like many other businesses returning to their workplaces, Chief Judge Janet DiFiore stressed that in-person court operations are under a "new normal." There are COVID screenings, social distancing protocols, strict sanitizing standards and plexiglass partitions, she said.
New York continues to see a downturn overall in key coronavirus figures, such as the number of people who are intubated and the number of new COVID-19 hospitalizations. The state's daily death toll has also dipped below 100 three times in the last several days, according to state figures.
It remains unclear when state officials will allow regions to move to phase two of the reopening scheme, which would allow law firms to open up their offices.
The Cuomo administration has said two weeks would have to elapse before regions could move into phase two. But the governor shied away from that timeline over the weekend, saying that decision "is more a judgment call" on when COVID-19 figures have stabilized.
The state's budget director, Robert Mujica, added that regions can move to phase two if there's no uptick in the health metrics.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250