'Perfect Storm' for Divorce: NY Matrimonial Attorneys Foresee Pandemic Breakups
Matrimonial attorneys say they are seeing an uptick overall in the interest for divorce.
May 26, 2020 at 06:19 PM
4 minute read
New York matrimonial lawyers say they anticipate a stream of divorces to stem from the COVID-19 crisis as families face a cocktail of financial strains and lengthy lockdowns induced by the pandemic.
Those factors have put pressure on existing fault lines in relationships and are expected to put troubled marriages on a quicker path toward divorce, they said. With sweeping stay-at-home orders, couples were forced to spend extended time together, possibly with the added stress of economic hardship.
"In some ways, it's a perfect storm for a divorce," said Ronnie Schindel, a partner at Pryor Cashman, noting the pandemic has cut off access to leisure activities and other outlets.
Schindel, who is also the president of the New York chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, said the pandemic will likely hastened the breakup of marriages that were headed for divorce already.
Divorce filings have poured into upstate New York courts over the last week as those areas began accepting new nonessential lawsuits. Those nonessential filings were previously banned under sweeping restrictions placed by the state's court system as New York's COVID-19 crisis escalated.
Earlier this year, New York issued a near-total ban on gatherings of any size and ordered nonessential employees to not show up to their workplace. The ban on gatherings has since been loosened and certain businesses in parts of the state have been allowed to bring their employees back to the workplace.
Meanwhile, matrimonial attorneys say they are seeing an uptick overall in the interest for divorce.
Some people simply want to be educated on their options, but others have made up their mind and are anxious to move on, said Claire Cody Miller, a matrimonial lawyer based on Staten Island. The lockdown measures combined with financial difficulties can put a strain on families, she said.
"There's a tremendous number of stressors," she said.
Some people are questioning whether they want to continue in a relationship that's not as fulfilling as they'd like, said Mitchell Y. Cohen, a partner and founding member at Johnson & Cohen.
"A lot of people are putting their lives in perspective," he said.
The state court system on Monday lifted the ban on new nonessential lawsuits for New York City, Long Island and the Mid-Hudson region. Matrimonial lawyers say they expect a wave of divorce filings to hit the courts eventually, both from people ready to split before the pandemic and from people brought to the brink while under lockdown.
As the nation trudges forward through the pandemic, some attorneys say the post-pandemic world has raised a host of child custody issues, such as if one parent is not following proper safety protocols.
Overall, courts will have to balance pandemic precautions with the benefits of a child having a relationship with both parents, said Adam Citron, a partner at Davidoff Hutcher & Citron.
The courts must also consider the mental and emotional well-being of a child, he said, noting that there could be drawbacks when a child goes months without seeing their mother or father.
"FaceTime is great, but it's not the same," he said.
Many couples appeared prepared to move quickly in the first days they could file.
At least a dozen couples filed for divorce on Monday in Manhattan alone, including fashion designer Mary-Kate Olsen and her husband, music producer Pierre Sarkozy, according to state court records.
Statewide, more than 400 couples filed for divorce between May 18 and Monday, according to the OCA data. The busiest county for matrimonial cases was Monroe, with more than 80 contested or uncontested divorces initiated.
Jane Wester contributed to this report.
READ MORE:
NY Courts to Lift Ban on New 'Nonessential' Lawsuits for Downstate Counties
Surge of New Lawsuits Filed in New York City as E-Filing Reopens to All Cases
Counseling 'Panicked and Desperate Clients': Practicing Family Law in a Pandemic
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Trial Court's Sidestep of 'Batson' Deprived Defendant of Challenge to Jury Discrimination
Decision of the Day: Commercial Division Finds Defendant Engaged in Unfair Competition Against Plaintiff
Decision of the Day: Court Rules on Judgment Motions Over Police Killing of Pet Dog While Executing Warrant
Decision of the Day: JFK to Paris Stowaway's Bail Revocation Explained
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250