Sale of Landmark NYCLA Building Fails to Close, Delaying Move to New Offices
The bar group's president said the deal was terminated after the buyer "failed to attend" a virtual real estate closing.
May 26, 2020 at 08:54 PM
4 minute read
The long-anticipated sale of the New York County Lawyers Association's headquarters in Manhattan has failed to close after the prospective buyer defaulted and didn't appear at the real estate closing, according to the bar group's leader. Now, NYCLA's plans to move to new offices are on hold.
Stephen Lessard, the group's president, told the bar's members on Tuesday that NYCLA's board of directors terminated the sale agreement "due to a default by the prospective purchaser."
Lessard, a senior associate at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, said the developments were "deeply disappointing," but the bar group was "in discussions with other parties who are interested in purchasing our building."
"The board still firmly believes that it is in the long-term interest of the association to sell our building and relocate to a contemporary space that enables us to best serve our membership," Lessard said in a statement to the bar's members.
NYCLA's board authorized the sale of its majestic 90-year-old headquarters at 14 Vesey St. last year. The bar group has owned the building since the 1930s, Lessard said.
Lessard, in an interview Tuesday, said NYCLA had been ready to close on the deal since it got approval from the state attorney general's office last year and has been working with the prospective buyer, who had asked for a series of extensions.
But within the last few weeks, at a virtual closing, the buyer "failed to attend or tell us they weren't going to be there," Lessard said. He added that the buyer defaulted by failing to close when NYCLA was ready to close and couldn't give a specific reason why it was not ready to close.
While Lessard said NYLCA could not disclose the buyer's name or the amount of the sale, the Real Deal reported in April 2019 that Jack Terzi of JTRE Holdings was buying the property "for a price in the low $20 million range."
In a statement to ALM late Tuesday, Terzi, represented by attorney Stuart Ball, disputed that JTRE defaulted on the purchase of 14 Vesey St. Instead, he claimed NYCLA "attempted to force a closing (in the middle of the pandemic) notwithstanding that it had not corrected [a] title defect."
Ultimately, the failed closing for NYCLA means it has to delay its relocation to new headquarters at 28 Liberty St. owned by Fosun International. "This has put a crimp in our move to a new space," Lessard confirmed Tuesday.
Lessard said NYCLA is still aiming to move to the new location this year and to sell its Vesey Street building. He also said the delay won't put a strain on NYCLA's finances. "We've always been in a good financial position," he said, noting the move wasn't financially motivated in the first place.
The Vesey Street building, a New York City landmark, is the work of Cass Gilbert, the architect who designed the U.S. Supreme Court. But staying in the building presented challenges. It was difficult and costly to modernize and extend Wi-Fi throughout the building. With millennials less interested in attending events onsite, bar associations have been reevaluating the cost of maintaining ornate and historic headquarters.
Lessard, in his email Tuesday, sought to reassure members that they would not be affected, writing that the failed closing "does not have any impact on our ability to continue to deliver" quality membership services and resources.
"It will also not hinder us in carrying out our mission to promote the rule of law through our pro bono programs, public policy initiatives, and work with other bar associations, the courts, and educational institutions," he added.
NYCLA, like other bar associations, across the country, is operating remotely now. Lessard said NYCLA's virtual organization is delivering information to its members from courts and government daily; its CLE on-demand and live webinar portfolio continues to grow; and its committees and sections continue to meet and collaborate virtually. Meanwhile, NYCLA is planning on Thursday its first virtual annual meeting, where officers and directors are elected.
This article has been updated to include a statement from Jack Terzi disputing that JTRE defaulted on the sale agreement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250