Uber and Lyft Drivers Sue Cuomo Over Struggle to Get Unemployment Benefits Amid Pandemic
The New York Taxi Workers Alliance sued New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the state Department of Labor on Monday, arguing that drivers working for apps including Uber and Lyft are owed regular and timely unemployment benefits in New York.
May 26, 2020 at 04:57 PM
4 minute read
The New York Taxi Workers Alliance sued New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the state Department of Labor on Monday, arguing that drivers working for apps including Uber and Lyft are owed regular and timely unemployment benefits.
The failure by Uber and Lyft to report their drivers' earnings has created unnecessary work for overburdened Department of Labor workers and put drivers at tremendous risk amid a global pandemic, advocates for the four drivers named in the suit said during a news conference Tuesday.
The suit comes nearly two years after the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that app-based drivers in New York are employees under unemployment insurance law, Nicole Salk, senior staff attorney at Legal Services NYC, and New York Taxi Workers Alliance staff attorney Zubin Soleimany noted in a complaint filed late Monday in the Eastern District of New York.
"The DOL's inaction flies in the face of settled law," Salk and Soleimany wrote.
Because Uber and Lyft have not reported earning data to the state, Salk said, drivers must go through a reconsideration process to even try to get unemployment benefits. Some drivers have given up because the process is so complicated and requires a fax machine, Salk said.
"It takes months in good times, and we are not in good times right now," she said.
Soleimany said filing for unemployment should be a "seamless process" for Uber and Lyft drivers, and they should start receiving benefits within two to three weeks like employees at other companies in New York. Instead, the four employees named as plaintiffs in Monday's suit said they have waited as long as two months.
In addition to the immediate payment of unemployment insurance benefits, the plaintiffs are seeking an order prohibiting their misclassification as independent contractors and compelling the DOL to require the companies to report their drivers' earning data.
Bhairavi Desai, executive director of the New York Taxi Workers Alliance, emphasized that the drivers are asking for a benefit they've already earned.
"We should not have to file a lawsuit to ask our Department of Labor to follow the law," she said.
Workers in the gig economy, including Uber and Lyft drivers, can receive Pandemic Unemployment Assistance through the CARES Act, according to the DOL's website.
New York has a single application for benefits to help workers determine whether they're eligible for unemployment insurance or PUA, but in the complaint, attorneys for the four drivers calculated that they would receive hundreds of dollars more per month in unemployment insurance compared to PUA.
Jack Sterne, a spokesperson for Cuomo's office, said New York has actually been processing requests for benefits faster than most other states.
"During this pandemic emergency, we have been moving heaven and earth to get every single unemployed New Yorker their benefits as quickly as possible—including Uber and Lyft drivers who are treated no different than any other worker and, during this crisis, are receiving unemployment benefits through the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program quicker than most other states," Sterne said in a statement. "New York launched our Pandemic Unemployment Assistance application weeks before other states, and we are now processing more than 100,000 PUA applications per week. As a result of this quick action and worker-friendly policy, we've delivered over $10 billion in benefits to 2 million unemployed New Yorkers—far more than any other state on a per-capita basis."
In a statement, Uber spokesman Harry Hartfield said the company has provided the data requested by New York state.
Julie Wood, a spokeswoman for Lyft, said in a statement that the company is working with the DOL.
"The special interests behind this lawsuit aren't interested in what's best for drivers, since filing this lawsuit will do nothing to help them get assistance quickly," Wood said. "We are working collaboratively with DOL to provide them access to earnings data and are doing everything we can to help drivers get the assistance they deserve."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250