Lender Says Pierce Bainbridge and Founder Owe Nearly $4 Million
Lender Karish Kapital claims that 25% of the firm's receivables "were to be paid daily" under a February agreement.
May 27, 2020 at 05:18 PM
3 minute read
Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht and founder John Pierce are on the hook for nearly $4 million, according to a lender, who filed in court Wednesday a confession of judgment signed by Pierce.
In an affidavit of confession of judgment, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, Pierce confirmed that he and the firm owed Karish Kapital for future receivables the lender purchased on Feb. 19. The value of the receivables was $3.75 million, according to Karish Kapital's court papers.
While 25% of the firm's receivables "were to be paid daily" to Karish, according to an agreement, Karish said it has not received any payment.
Due to Pierce and the firm's nonpayment, Karish filed the confession of judgment and asked the court for an additional $100,000 for attorney fees, as well as interest, totaling about $3.94 million.
Peirce did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday. Ariel Bouskila, a partner at Berkovitch & Bouskila representing Karish, also didn't immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
The confession of judgment is the latest development in Pierce Bainbridge's relationship with Karish, which describes itself on social media as providing "fast" cash advances for small and midsize businesses. Days after Karish purchased the firm's receivables, it filed a lien on Feb. 25 on Pierce Bainbridge's assets, Pierce and John M Pierce Enterprises LLC.
In early March, a firm representative said a "preliminary investigation" revealed that Pierce accepted money from Karish Kapital for his personal use. The spokeswoman at the time said Pierce was on a leave of absence. The tumult raised further questions about the future of Pierce Bainbridge, which has garnered attention in recent years for its rapid growth and use of litigation funding. The firm has lately weathered a slew of partner departures. Pierce in April denied the firm was closing.
Slate Advance and West Coast Business Capital have also sued the firm this year, alleging in March suits that they bought law firm receivables but the firm and Pierce defaulted.
|Read More
Ex-Managing Partner, 3 Others Leave Pierce Bainbridge to Start New Firm
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 2Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 3Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 4Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 5'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250