Federal Defenders Say Jailed Clients Need More Video Time With Attorneys Amid Pandemic
Months after the COVID-19 pandemic ended in-person legal visits at Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center and Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center, videoconferences with attorneys are still only available to a few inmates each day—a situation the Federal Defenders of New York described as "plainly insufficient" in a letter filed late Wednesday.
May 28, 2020 at 06:14 PM
3 minute read
Months after the COVID-19 pandemic ended in-person legal visits at Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center and Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center, videoconferences with attorneys are still only available to a few inmates each day—a situation the Federal Defenders of New York described as "plainly insufficient" in a letter filed late Wednesday.
Assistant U.S. attorneys Seth Eichenholtz and Sean Greene, who represent the Federal Bureau of Prisons, said in a separate letter Wednesday that the facilities undertook a "herculean effort" to maintain legal access for inmates amid the pandemic.
About four 30-minute videoconferences are available each day at the MCC, according to Eichenholtz and Greene. About four videoconferences per day are also available for MDC inmates, but about half of those calls require the inmate's attorney to go to the federal courthouse in Brooklyn to participate.
Sean Hecker of Kaplan Hecker & Fink, who is representing the Federal Defenders, wrote in Wednesday's letter that at least 10 videoconferences of at least one hour will soon be required at each facility each day, as the courts continue to rebound from the initial adjustment to the pandemic and hold more substantive proceedings.
"Rather than continue to defer meaningful contact with clients in the hope that there will be a sudden change in the public health situation, we think it makes sense to develop a system now that will enable the building of attorney-client relationships and the review of discovery, to the extent possible," he wrote.
Hecker called on the BOP to propose a "concrete plan" to expand video access at both facilities. As more attorneys are appointed to new cases, they have to try to establish new relationships with clients and cannot do so through brief and rare calls, he wrote.
"We recognize that this will require an investment of resources by the MDC and MCC," he wrote. "But, without this, there is simply no way to review discovery with a client. Nor can one prepare a client to testify at a preliminary hearing or plead guilty. And that's assuming that the attorney has already forged enough of a relationship with the client prior to the pandemic to be able to engage in such substantive discussions."
Federal Defenders in other areas have reported that their clients can review discovery on iPads during videoconferences, Hecker wrote. Even on Rikers Island, which has reported far more cases of COVID-19 than the MDC or MCC, Hecker said videoconferences seem to be "relatively easy" to schedule on Skype and also seem to be longer, by default, than the MDC and MCC's 30-minute conferences.
While many more telephone calls are placed each week than video calls, "overflow" call requests have also been a recurring issue at both facilities, according to court papers.
A telephone status conference is set for Friday morning before U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie of the Eastern District of New York.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Trending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman Corporate Partner Heads to Jones Day
- 2Funding Rebound: The Top 2024 Legal Tech Investments
- 3Presidential Pardons: A Tool That Can be Used to Move Forward
- 4Some of 2024's Most Notable GC Moves Were Drenched in Drama
- 5Will 2025 Bring a Change to Lawyers' Mandatory Pro Bono Duties Under 'Madden'?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250