Now Is Not the Time To Defund the Courts
Now that the Legislature has reconvened and Gov. Andrew Cuomo has issued warnings that the state budget will have to be cut unless federal funding is made available, it is time to consider the effect such budget cuts will have on the operation of the courts.
May 29, 2020 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
A significant financial crisis is looming for New York state courts and those who use the courts to resolve their legal problems. This crisis will be greatly compounded because of the current hardship arising out of the COVID-19 crisis, unless some kind of urgent action is taken.
Now that the Legislature has reconvened and Gov. Andrew Cuomo has issued warnings that the state budget will have to be cut unless federal funding is made available, it is time to consider the effect such budget cuts will have on the operation of the courts.
In the Financial Plan for Fiscal Year 2021 released in early May, the State Budget Director warned that significant cuts in state spending would take place, unless the Legislature responds with a plan of its own. The Legislature granted the Budget Director the authority to reduce aid-to-localities appropriations and disbursements by any amount needed to achieve a balanced budget and states that the Financial Plan "assumes that the Judiciary and elected officials will initiate comparable reductions in their budgets for FY 2021."
At the Fund for Modern Courts, a non-partisan organization committed to improving the court system, we do not see how the Judiciary can absorb the cuts of least 10% as suggested in the Financial Plan without significantly impacting the administration of justice in this state. We are particularly concerned about cuts to those service organization that represent individuals of limited means, victims of domestic violence, immigrants, tenants, small businesses, and many more.
Given the flood of new cases expected over the next several months as the courts fully reopen, the impact of cuts is dire especially to the most vulnerable in our society, including those hardest hit by COVID-19, who will need representation in cases involving potential homelessness, food insecurity, unemployment, mortgage foreclosure, domestic violence, and whatever else lies in the wake of this unprecedented challenge to public safety.
The last time the Judiciary budget was cut, by $170 million in April 2011, the impact on the court system was serious and widespread, resulting in the reduction in hours that court facilities were able to operate, drastic staffing cuts, and mounting backlogs. Layoffs, early-retirement programs, and hiring freezes resulted in 1,151 fewer employees.
Budget cuts of 10% this year would exceed $200 million and would have an even greater impact on court operations than the cuts in 2011.
So what does all of this mean? Two things cry out. First, the bleak financial outlook for New York—a direct result of COVID-19—calls for an immediate round of federal funding directed to the states. Second, regardless of whether and to what extent federal funding comes through, the Judiciary should be spared the level of budget cuts now being contemplated. Treating the Judiciary simply as a state agency worthy of across-the-board cuts is not only bad public policy but poses a threat to the very fabric of our society. "Equal Justice Under Law" is not only a catchy phrase appearing above the entrance to the U.S. Supreme Court, it is a fundamental principle essential to a free and fair society that requires a strong and independent Judiciary. That is true in the best of times and is especially true today.
Given the complexity of issues relating to the current pandemic, we recommend the creation of a Special Commission on COVID-19 and the Courts, consisting of bar leaders, civil legal service providers, criminal defense attorneys, prosecutors, and community-based organizations to make recommendations about how best to meet the demands of surging legal needs throughout the State.
Now is not the time to defund the courts. Now is the time to take bold action. We need to simplify New York's court system, fund organizations which serve those most impacted by this public health crisis, and preserve the jobs of those who make the justice system work for all New Yorkers. They are the next wave of first responders to get us through this crisis.
William C. Silverman, a partner at Proskauer Rose, is the Vice-Chair of the Fund for Modern Courts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Judge Precludes Ballistics Expert's Opinion on Scene for 2016 Fatal Police Shooting
Decision of the Day: Contingency Fee to Counsel Result of Successful Advocacy, Not Windfall
AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
3 minute readDecision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250