'A Crisis Within a Crisis': Manhattan Judge Rules Some Delay From Arrest to Arraignment Is Reasonable
While the New York courts have held that people should generally be arraigned within 24 hours, New York County Supreme Court Justice James Burke said he had to consider that the city is facing a pandemic and mass protests at the same time.
June 04, 2020 at 06:23 PM
3 minute read
New York County Supreme Court Justice James Burke on Thursday denied a writ filed by New York's Legal Aid Society, refusing to release people detained for longer than 24 hours between arrest and arraignment — a group that has numbered above 100 for most of the week.
While the New York courts have held that people should generally be arraigned within 24 hours, Burke said he had to consider that the city is facing a pandemic and mass protests at the same time, and those issues have slowed down the system.
"There is a crisis within a crisis," Burke said, echoing the argument of the New York City Law Department earlier in the hearing.
Burke quoted from the 1991 New York State Court of Appeals decision in Roundtree v. New York, which found that "arrestees held in custody for more than 24 hours without arraignment are entitled to release unless an acceptable explanation for the delay is given." In this case, he ruled, the New York City Police Department had provided acceptable explanations for the delay.
During the hearing, which was conducted through Skype, NYPD officials asked Burke to consider his own experience presiding over virtual court parts to demonstrate that virtual arraignment parts cannot handle the same case volume as the pre-pandemic physical parts.
They also argued that amid protests against police brutality across the city, police officers have had to change their usual procedures for security reasons and in an attempt to manage a sudden increase in arrests.
Most people arrested at protests are released with a summons or a desk appearance ticket, the NYPD officials said. Expansions of arraignment parts, including the return of an overnight part, have helped manage case volume but have not solved it, they said.
As of 5:15 p.m. Thursday, 131 people had been held for longer than 24 hours in Manhattan, state court system spokesman Lucian Chalfen said.
Attorneys for the Legal Aid Society, including Russell Novack, argued that the NYPD has the resources to process people more quickly but refuses to use them.
"The police department has a history … of deliberately delaying people's arraignments because they don't like what they're doing on the street," Novack said.
Burke asked attorneys for both sides to focus on the subjects of the Legal Aid Society writ, which was filed Tuesday, after a back-and-forth on police procedures.
"A person should never be detained on a summons or DAT," Legal Aid's Marlen Bodden said.
Officers are no longer issuing summons on the street, Assistant Deputy Commissioner Janine Gilbert said, because they can't safely take their focus off their surroundings to write out the tickets. That means that more people must be transported to arrest processing, where social distancing is not always possible, Gilbert acknowledged.
"These protesters, while they are out on the street, are not social distancing either," she said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250