NY Gov. Cuomo Calls for Bail to Be Set for Accused Looters
Cuomo pushed back against the suggestion that he was urging prosecutors to upcharge crimes, instead saying he wants them to "charge appropriately."
June 04, 2020 at 06:36 PM
4 minute read
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo suggested Thursday that bail should be set on people using the George Floyd protests as an opportunity to break windows and steal.
"It would be nonsensical if the police were arresting looters and they were then being arrested and returned to the street the next day to loot again," the Democrat said at a press conference, in a message apparently aimed at New York City prosecutors. "That would be nonsensical."
His comments calling for bail stand in contrast to his previous remarks on the topic.
"It's inarguable that you shouldn't be making these decisions based on how wealthy a person is, which is how bail winds up being," Cuomo said earlier this year, according to a transcript. "If you can pay, you get out. If you can't pay, you stay. That's the bottom line, and wealth is often a proxy for race."
On Thursday, the third-term governor said scenes of looting captured on video were "indefensible and inexcusable."
Queens Defenders, along with other organizations, issued a joint statement on Thursday saying Cuomo's response instructs district attorneys to "trump up" charges and "inflate allegations" to jail New Yorkers.
"This blatant disregard for truth in prosecution is aberrant to the demand for a fair justice system that protesters are now demanding. We demand that Governor Cuomo reject this dangerous plea," according to the statement from various organizations, which included The Legal Aid Society.
Cuomo pushed back against the suggestion that he was urging prosecutors to upcharge crimes, instead saying he wants them to "charge appropriately."
"Look at the facts, look at what they did and charge appropriately. That's what I'm saying," Cuomo remarked.
Danny Frost, a spokesman at the Manhattan district attorney's office, weighed in on Thursday, saying in a statement that the "overwhelming majority" of looting cases in Manhattan cannot be charged as second-degree burglary.
"The facts of those cases don't support such a charge," he said in a statement.
State law says a person can be guilty of second-degree burglary if they use "or threatens the immediate use of a dangerous instrument" in "effecting entry or while in the building."
"I understand some of the district attorneys may feel uncomfortable charging that as burg two, because traditionally they [charge] that as burg three. But they have the tools available to them," said Melissa DeRosa, secretary to the governor.
David Hoovler, president of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, issued a statement saying the state's penal law does not support the idea that prosecutors can charge second-degree burglary in situations where people throw rocks "through windows of closed businesses to loot."
That act alone does not rise to a second-degree burglary charge, "if the premises are not directly shared with a dwelling," he said in the statement.
"The mere use of a brick or rock to smash a window does not rise to the status of a dangerous instrument unless it is used in a way that would cause serious physical injury to someone on the other side," he said in a statement.
READ MORE:
George Floyd's Death Sparks Revived Calls for NY Criminal Justice Reform Bills
2nd Circuit Rejects Qualified Immunity in Lawsuit Over Police Shooting of Mentally Ill Man
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250