NY Gov. Cuomo Calls for Bail to Be Set for Accused Looters
Cuomo pushed back against the suggestion that he was urging prosecutors to upcharge crimes, instead saying he wants them to "charge appropriately."
June 04, 2020 at 06:36 PM
4 minute read
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo suggested Thursday that bail should be set on people using the George Floyd protests as an opportunity to break windows and steal.
"It would be nonsensical if the police were arresting looters and they were then being arrested and returned to the street the next day to loot again," the Democrat said at a press conference, in a message apparently aimed at New York City prosecutors. "That would be nonsensical."
His comments calling for bail stand in contrast to his previous remarks on the topic.
"It's inarguable that you shouldn't be making these decisions based on how wealthy a person is, which is how bail winds up being," Cuomo said earlier this year, according to a transcript. "If you can pay, you get out. If you can't pay, you stay. That's the bottom line, and wealth is often a proxy for race."
On Thursday, the third-term governor said scenes of looting captured on video were "indefensible and inexcusable."
Queens Defenders, along with other organizations, issued a joint statement on Thursday saying Cuomo's response instructs district attorneys to "trump up" charges and "inflate allegations" to jail New Yorkers.
"This blatant disregard for truth in prosecution is aberrant to the demand for a fair justice system that protesters are now demanding. We demand that Governor Cuomo reject this dangerous plea," according to the statement from various organizations, which included The Legal Aid Society.
Cuomo pushed back against the suggestion that he was urging prosecutors to upcharge crimes, instead saying he wants them to "charge appropriately."
"Look at the facts, look at what they did and charge appropriately. That's what I'm saying," Cuomo remarked.
Danny Frost, a spokesman at the Manhattan district attorney's office, weighed in on Thursday, saying in a statement that the "overwhelming majority" of looting cases in Manhattan cannot be charged as second-degree burglary.
"The facts of those cases don't support such a charge," he said in a statement.
State law says a person can be guilty of second-degree burglary if they use "or threatens the immediate use of a dangerous instrument" in "effecting entry or while in the building."
"I understand some of the district attorneys may feel uncomfortable charging that as burg two, because traditionally they [charge] that as burg three. But they have the tools available to them," said Melissa DeRosa, secretary to the governor.
David Hoovler, president of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, issued a statement saying the state's penal law does not support the idea that prosecutors can charge second-degree burglary in situations where people throw rocks "through windows of closed businesses to loot."
That act alone does not rise to a second-degree burglary charge, "if the premises are not directly shared with a dwelling," he said in the statement.
"The mere use of a brick or rock to smash a window does not rise to the status of a dangerous instrument unless it is used in a way that would cause serious physical injury to someone on the other side," he said in a statement.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250