Defense Lawyers Appeal Ruling to Allow Arraignment Delays for Persons Arrested at NYC Protests
Ninety-two people across the city had been held for more than 24 hours at the time of filing Friday afternoon, according to Legal Aid. The number fluctuated into the hundreds this week, with many arrests related to mass protests for racial justice and against police brutality across the city.
June 05, 2020 at 04:42 PM
3 minute read
One day after New York County Supreme Court Justice James Burke denied a writ filed by New York's Legal Aid Society on behalf of people held in New York City jails for more than 24 hours without arraignment, Legal Aid filed a notice of appeal to the Appellate Division, First Department.
The appeal will be calendared for a future hearing, and interim relief will not be available, state court spokesman Lucian Chalfen said Friday.
Ninety-two people across the city had been held for more than 24 hours at the time of filing Friday afternoon, according to Legal Aid. The number fluctuated into the hundreds this week, with many arrests related to mass protests for racial justice and against police brutality across the city.
Arguing on behalf of the New York City Police Department, an attorney for the New York City Law Department told Burke that the slowdown in arrest-to-arraignment times happened because the city was facing "a crisis within a crisis."
Virtual arraignment parts introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic operate more slowly, attorneys for the police argued, and police officers are no longer writing summons on the streets for safety reasons. The virtual arraignment parts expanded this week, including with the addition of an overnight shift, but the NYPD attorneys argued that they are still facing a difficult situation.
Burke echoed the "crisis within a crisis" phrase in his oral ruling Thursday, finding that both state and federal law permit delays in the arrest-to-arraignment timeline in certain situations.
In a statement on the appeal Friday, Tina Luongo, attorney-in-charge of the Legal Aid Society's Criminal Defense Practice, said she looks forward to a successful outcome in the Appellate Division.
"The NYPD is not above the law, and detaining New Yorkers for more than 24 hours after an arrest and denying them speedy access to a judge violates … our fundamental standards of justice," Luongo said. "92 New Yorkers held illegally, deprived of their due process rights, is 92 New Yorkers too many."
READ MORE:
NY Gov. Cuomo Calls for Bail to Be Set for Accused Looters
George Floyd's Death Sparks Revived Calls for NY Criminal Justice Reform Bills
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250