Letter Demands NYPD Discipline After Legal Observers Were Detained, Illegally Searched During Bronx Protest
A New York attorney with extensive legal observation experience who also signed the letter said that while legal observers occasionally get arrested or shoved against cars by police, Thursday's events stood out.
June 08, 2020 at 06:37 PM
4 minute read
In a letter to New York City Police Commissioner Dermot Shea, the president of the New York City chapter of the National Lawyers Guild on Sunday demanded discipline for the NYPD officers who searched and detained NLG legal observers at a protest Thursday in the Bronx.
During the protest against police brutality in Mott Haven, nine legal observers wearing neon green hats marked "National Lawyers Guild Legal Observer" were restrained with zip-tie cuffs and prevented from doing their constitutionally protected work, NLG-NYC President Andy Izenson wrote in the letter.
Moira Meltzer-Cohen, a New York attorney with extensive legal observation experience who also signed the letter, said that while legal observers occasionally get arrested or shoved against cars by police, Thursday's events stood out.
"I don't believe that I have ever observed that level of physicality with that many legal observers all at once," she said.
Several legal observers were thrown to the ground before they were cuffed, including Rex Santus, a rising 2L at City University of New York School of Law.
Santus said he heard one comment from an NYPD officer that indicated the legal observers were being targeted, although officers also insisted they had never heard of legal observers.
"We had asked the NYPD what was going on, why we were detained, and one of them said something to the effect of 'We were told to round up the green hats,'" Santus said.
Before the mass detention of the legal observers, Santus said he was cornered by a group of about eight NYPD officers who seized his notes, which are considered privileged material.
Even though Santus was wearing his neon hat and immediately explained that he was a legal observer, he said the officers claimed to be unfamiliar with the concept.
The officers mocked him and read his notes aloud to him, Santus said. One officer accused him of "illegal countersurveillance of the police," he recalled.
The NLG letter emphasized that legal observers' rights are explained in the NYPD's Patrol Guide. The neon green hat has long been understood to identify a legal observer, Meltzer-Cohen said, and the program has been operating since the late 1960s.
"NYPD officers should be, and have long been, on notice of what the legal observation program is, of who the National Lawyers Guild is, of what legal observers are there to do at protests, of the fact that what they do is constitutionally protected activity, of the fact that their notes are considered privileged, of how to identify them by their bright green hats," she said.
Legal observers were also specifically exempted from the city's 8 p.m. curfew and carried paperwork to that effect, Meltzer-Cohen said, noting that the curfew was apparently serving as the justification for the mass arrests in Mott Haven.
In addition to discipline for the officers and supervisors involved in the actions against legal observers Thursday, the letter demanded that Shea remind all NYPD officers about legal observers' status and role.
Press officers for the NYPD and the New York City Law Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250