Letter Demands NYPD Discipline After Legal Observers Were Detained, Illegally Searched During Bronx Protest
A New York attorney with extensive legal observation experience who also signed the letter said that while legal observers occasionally get arrested or shoved against cars by police, Thursday's events stood out.
June 08, 2020 at 06:37 PM
4 minute read
In a letter to New York City Police Commissioner Dermot Shea, the president of the New York City chapter of the National Lawyers Guild on Sunday demanded discipline for the NYPD officers who searched and detained NLG legal observers at a protest Thursday in the Bronx.
During the protest against police brutality in Mott Haven, nine legal observers wearing neon green hats marked "National Lawyers Guild Legal Observer" were restrained with zip-tie cuffs and prevented from doing their constitutionally protected work, NLG-NYC President Andy Izenson wrote in the letter.
Moira Meltzer-Cohen, a New York attorney with extensive legal observation experience who also signed the letter, said that while legal observers occasionally get arrested or shoved against cars by police, Thursday's events stood out.
"I don't believe that I have ever observed that level of physicality with that many legal observers all at once," she said.
Several legal observers were thrown to the ground before they were cuffed, including Rex Santus, a rising 2L at City University of New York School of Law.
Santus said he heard one comment from an NYPD officer that indicated the legal observers were being targeted, although officers also insisted they had never heard of legal observers.
"We had asked the NYPD what was going on, why we were detained, and one of them said something to the effect of 'We were told to round up the green hats,'" Santus said.
Before the mass detention of the legal observers, Santus said he was cornered by a group of about eight NYPD officers who seized his notes, which are considered privileged material.
Even though Santus was wearing his neon hat and immediately explained that he was a legal observer, he said the officers claimed to be unfamiliar with the concept.
The officers mocked him and read his notes aloud to him, Santus said. One officer accused him of "illegal countersurveillance of the police," he recalled.
The NLG letter emphasized that legal observers' rights are explained in the NYPD's Patrol Guide. The neon green hat has long been understood to identify a legal observer, Meltzer-Cohen said, and the program has been operating since the late 1960s.
"NYPD officers should be, and have long been, on notice of what the legal observation program is, of who the National Lawyers Guild is, of what legal observers are there to do at protests, of the fact that what they do is constitutionally protected activity, of the fact that their notes are considered privileged, of how to identify them by their bright green hats," she said.
Legal observers were also specifically exempted from the city's 8 p.m. curfew and carried paperwork to that effect, Meltzer-Cohen said, noting that the curfew was apparently serving as the justification for the mass arrests in Mott Haven.
In addition to discipline for the officers and supervisors involved in the actions against legal observers Thursday, the letter demanded that Shea remind all NYPD officers about legal observers' status and role.
Press officers for the NYPD and the New York City Law Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday.
READ MORE:
NY Lawmakers Pledge To Pass Police Reforms Amid Anti-Police Brutality Protests
Defense Lawyers Appeal Ruling to Allow Arraignment Delays for Persons Arrested at NYC Protests
Manhattan DA Vance Says Low-Level Arrests of Protesters Will Not Be Prosecuted
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250