NY Lawmakers Pledge to Pass Police Reforms Amid Anti-Police Brutality Protests
In New York, the most high-profile reform proposal is a bill that would repeal a state law used to keep police disciplinary records secret.
June 08, 2020 at 11:04 AM
6 minute read
New York legislative leaders on Monday pledged to pass a slate of police reforms after widespread protests over police brutality gripped the nation's attention.
The package of bills includes a measure that would repeal a contentious state law used to keep police disciplinary records secret. Advocates say the law, known as 50-a for its spot in New York's Civil Rights Law, prevents officers with past misconduct from being held accountable by shielding information from the public.
Police groups oppose repealing the state law, but the idea has enjoyed wide support from civil rights groups, criminal defense lawyers and the state's Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Legislative Caucus.
The measures before the Legislature touch on a host of policing reforms, such as a ban on choke holds. Momentum for the legislation comes following outrage and nationwide protests over the death of George Floyd in Minnesota and the killing of black Americans by police.
Those protests, some punctuated by violent responses from police against protesters, have since sparked a larger national conversation on systemic racism and the intersection of race and policing. The breadth of the protests has been staggering, with demonstrations popping up in large metropolises and small towns alike.
Assemblywoman Crystal Peoples-Stokes, the chamber's majority leader, said black people and other people of color are not anti-police, but are anti-bad police.
"For generations, we have been hunted, abused—mentally and physically—by bad police," said Peoples-Stokes, who is black.
State Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins issued a statement saying the bills poised to pass "will help stop bad actors and send a clear message that brutality, racism, and unjustified killings will not be tolerated."
The current 50-a law says "all personnel records used to evaluate performance toward continued employment or promotion" should be considered "confidential and not subject to inspection or review," without written consent. The records can also be released through a court order.
Those protections extend to correction officers and firefighters under the law.
One bill would repeal the law, but stipulates carve-outs that would prevent the release of officers' medical history, their home addresses and cellphone numbers. Under the bill, that information would be redacted.
The Legal Aid Society has backed the bill, saying lawmakers have "zero excuse" not to green-light the measure and send it to Gov. Andrew Cuomo's desk for approval.
"While this legislation will never fully right the abuses our clients have and continue to endure at the hands of the NYPD, enacting this bill into law at once is a critical step forward towards transparency and accountability for one of America's largest and most brutal police forces," the organization said in a statement.
Cuomo has said he will approve any legislation that reforms or repeals the 50-a statute.
Repeal legislation has faced sharp opposition from police organizations. They argue the protections keep officers safe.
Here are other state reform measures:
Low-Level Offenses
Some lawmakers want to require the state's court system to compile and publish data on low-level offenses, along with racial and other demographic information on those charged.
Under the legislation, the court system would post the data on its website and update it on a monthly basis.
The legislation would require the posting of the number of misdemeanors charged and the disposition of cases.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 2
- 2Being a Profession is Not Malarkey
- 3Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open
- 4High-Speed Crash With Police Vehicle Nets $1.6 Million Settlement
- 5Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250