Brooklyn Judge Finds 'Cautious Optimism' in Federal Jail's Response to COVID-19
Lawyers representing MDC inmates, several of whom have since been released, argued that the court needed to intervene immediately because of severe flaws in the facility's response to the pandemic.
June 09, 2020 at 06:11 PM
3 minute read
U.S. District Judge Rachel Kovner of the Eastern District of New York on Tuesday denied a motion for preliminary injunction that would have released medically vulnerable inmates from Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center, finding that the available evidence gives reason for "cautious optimism" about the MDC's response to COVID-19 so far.
Attorneys from Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady and the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law's Civil Rights Clinic filed a proposed class action lawsuit in late March against MDC Warden Derek Edge. The lawyers represented a group of MDC inmates, several of whom have since been released, and they argued that the court needed to intervene immediately because of severe flaws in the facility's response to the pandemic.
In her 62-page opinion, Kovner weighed the conflicting results of a series of inspections of the MDC by experts on both sides of the case. While the MDC has only tested a small portion of its nearly 1,700 inmates, Kovner noted that no inmates have died from COVID-19 and only one has been hospitalized.
"Any inference that MDC officials have been knowingly disregarding an excessive risk in their implementation of CDC guidance is undercut by the data about the effectiveness of the MDC's countermeasures thus far," she wrote.
On the other hand, Kovner said the MDC must undertake a "swift response" after failing to implement parts of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance for the pandemic. Responses to "sick call requests," or requests for medical care, have been slow at times, Kovner found, and not all inmates showing COVID-like symptoms were isolated.
Kovner found that because the CDC guidance was complex and resource-intensive, the shortfalls suggested negligent error rather than knowing disregard of a substantial risk of harm.
She also drew an adverse inference against the MDC, finding that MDC officials spoliated evidence by destroying paper sick call requests after the lawsuit was filed. Kovner wrote that the destroyed records would have contained additional reports of COVID-19 symptoms in the first three weeks of April, when the pandemic was at its peak in New York City.
"The court's sanction of the MDC for spoliating evidence during the litigation is a reminder that prison officials are not above the rules," one of the inmates' attorneys, Katherine Rosenfeld of Emery Celli, said in a statement.
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York, which is representing the MDC, declined to comment Tuesday.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Under Trump 2.0 Likely to Take More 'Measured' Enforcement Approach, Observers Say
Decision of the Day: Attorney in Social Security Case Awarded Fees, But Must Pay Client Refund Under Equal Access to Justice Act
Trending Stories
- 1Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: It's Bonus Time
- 3Maryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
- 4Thompson Coburn Hit With Class Action Over Data Breach
- 5The Coming of Trump's Judicial Picks Spurs Liberals to Press for Biden's
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250