Students, Faculty From All 15 NY Law Schools Signed Petition Calling for Repeal of Section 50-a
The petition, which had more than 2,150 signatures by Tuesday evening and which continues to grow, is the brainchild of a 3rd-year law student at St. John's University School of Law. It began circulating over this past weekend and started gaining signatures almost by the hour, she says.
June 09, 2020 at 07:49 PM
4 minute read
As the state legislature debated, and ultimately passed, on Tuesday evening a bill that would repeal a state law that for decades has kept secret police disciplinary records, a quickly circulated petition calling for the law's repeal continued to grab signatures—more than 2,150 by 7:30 p.m. Tuesday—from law students, faculty members and administrators found at all 15 law schools across New York State.
The petition, the brainchild of an 3rd-year law student at St. John's University School of Law, began circulating this past weekend. It gained momentum quickly, with signatures rolling in almost by the hour, said the law student, Jen Hopkins, in a phone interview late Tuesday afternoon.
The petition was sent as an email "blast" to all state assembly and senate members on Monday, said Hopkins. At that point it had nearly 2,000 signatures, she said. On Tuesday, the state legislature—beginning with the senate chamber, followed by the assembly—debated and ultimately passed a bill would repeal the law, although with stipulated carve-outs. They include allowing the release of police officers' medical histories and cellphone numbers.
The assembly's discussion of the bill began in the afternoon and lasted for hours Tuesday, and various groups had come out in support of the measure, such as the Legal Aid Society of New York. It said that lawmakers have "zero excuse" not to approve the repeal-bill.
The bill still has to be signed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo to become law. But Cuomo has promised to sign any legislation that reforms or repeals the law, which is known as 50-a for its number found in the state's Civil Rights Law. Police organizations have voiced strong opposition to any such legislation.
Hopkins said that she spent all night last Thursday working on the language of her petition, which argues that "New York has the most restrictive law in the country when it comes to transparency for police misconduct."
Pointing to the galvanizing and disturbing death of George Floyd in Minneapolis—which has set off nationwide protests the show no signs of stopping—Hopkins' petition says that "recent cases of police misconduct and the ongoing systemic lack of accountability make it clear that New York should join the majority of other states in increasing the transparency of police misconduct records."
The petition also contends that "only two other states in this country have statutes that exempt police officers from public records law," and that "our state should be leading the way on transparency instead of being at the back of the pack and behind the times."
The law schools, at the bottom of the petition, are listed in alphabetical order, starting with Albany Law School. The names flow on from there. About 15 lawyers, mostly public defenders and from advocacy groups, also signed on to it Tuesday, Hopkins said.
She said that last Thursday evening, at St. John's law school, about 300 students and faculty attended a forum spurred by the George Floyd protests and the systemic issue of law enforcement abuses. It was titled "No More Talking, What are We Going to Do."
"There is anger and passion right now, so I wanted to think of something that had an impact immediately," she said. When she offered up her petition idea to the forum, she said, some liked it but a professor said it would be very hard to get a petition written, circulated and signed by people at all 15 law schools in the state quickly.
"Once he [the professor] pretty much challenged me to do it, I accepted the challenge," she said. After writing the petition overnight and having it edited, she blasted a Google sheet with the petition to all of St. John's law school. Then she "spent the weekend," she said, getting the same sheet out to the other 14 schools.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250