Avenatti Renews Bid to Send Stormy Daniels Theft Case to California, Citing Pandemic-Related Concerns
The embattled celebrity attorney, who was convicted in February of trying to extort Nike Inc., on Thursday renewed his bid to transfer the case charging him with stealing money from his former client, adult-film star Stormy Daniels, from New York to Los Angeles.
June 12, 2020 at 01:11 PM
4 minute read
Michael Avenatti has again asked a Manhattan federal judge to transfer his pending criminal case to California, where he is also under federal indictment, arguing that complications from the COVID-19 pandemic made it impractical to proceed with separate trials on two coasts.
The embattled celebrity attorney, who was convicted in February of trying to extort Nike Inc., on Thursday renewed his bid to transfer the case charging him with stealing money from his former client, adult-film star Stormy Daniels, from New York to Los Angeles.
He is also accused in the Central District of California of stealing millions of dollars from former clients and then submitting false tax returns.
Avenatti, who rose to prominence representing Daniels in her lawsuits against President Donald Trump, argued in a six-page transfer motion that both cases should be tried together, due to the strains on judicial resources resulting from the pandemic.
"In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is no compelling reason to proceed with two separate trials on two different coasts. The conservation of judicial and juror resources, as well as the protection of the public from exposure to SARS-CoV-2, are paramount," wrote attorney Thomas Warren, of Warren Terzian in Los Angeles.
The late U.S. District Judge Deborah A. Batts of the Southern District of New York denied a similar request by Avenatti and his lawyer, H. Dean Steward, last September, finding that a move to consolidate the two cases likely would create more problems than it would solve. Consolidation, she said, would not be automatic, and a transfer would require the New York prosecution team to relocate for a time to the West Coast.
Since then, however, the COVID-19 crisis has forced the Southern District to shutter nearly all in-person operations, and jury trials in the district have been postponed indefinitely. The judge overseeing the sprawling criminal case in California in April also ordered Avenatti temporarily released from Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center, where he had been awaiting sentencing in the Nike case, due to health concerns stemming from the pandemic.
In Thursday's motion, Warren said that growing court backlogs and concerns about public safety had only bolstered his client's arguments in support of his transfer motion.
"There is no reason to assemble two jury venires and unnecessarily expose two sets of judicial participants—judges, law clerks, jurors, attorneys, witnesses, court reporters, court clerks, members of the public, and the media—to possible infection with SARS-CoV-2, which has already infected more than 2 million Americans and killed more than 110,000 at the time of this writing," he said.
The motion is now before U.S. District Judge Jesse M. Furman of the Southern District of New York, who has taken over the case following Batts' sudden death in February.
The move also comes after federal prosecutors in California this week accused Avenatti of violating the terms of his release by using a computer to draft his own legal filings while under home confinement at a friend's house in California.
Steward responded that his client has complied with all of the terms of his release and said that Avenatti had not used the internet since his release from jail.
The Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office has accused Avenatti of stealing money from book payments belonging to his former client Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford. He has maintained his innocence and repeatedly denied any wrongdoing.
Trial in the case is tentatively set for October; however, court shutdowns resulting from the pandemic make it unlikely that trials in the Southern District will resume until next year, sources have told the Law Journal.
In California, Avenatti is charged tax fraud, bankruptcy fraud and other offenses in a 36-count indictment alleging that he had stolen from former clients. In particular, he faces 10 counts of wire fraud for pocketing millions of dollars from more than $12 million he received during the past five years as part of four settlements, including one on behalf of a paraplegic client.
Avenatti has pleaded not guilty to the charges.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250