Former Head of Diversity at Morgan Stanley Sues Firm, Claiming Widespread Mistreatment of Black Women
Marilyn Booker served as Morgan Stanley's global head of diversity from 1994 to 2010, but she was "inexplicably" removed from that role soon after James Gorman became Morgan Stanley's CEO, according to the suit, which was filed by Wigdor partner Jeanne Christensen.
June 16, 2020 at 06:26 PM
4 minute read
A former high-ranking black employee at Morgan Stanley sued the investment firm Tuesday in the Eastern District of New York, arguing that the firm has systematically mistreated black women and that she lost her job because she pushed for more diversity.
Along with a proposed class action suit on behalf of black female employees of Morgan Stanley, Marilyn Booker is filing a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, according to court papers.
Booker served as Morgan Stanley's global head of diversity from 1994 to 2010, but she was "inexplicably" removed from that role soon after James Gorman became Morgan Stanley's CEO, according to the suit, which was filed by Wigdor partner Jeanne Christensen.
Though Morgan Stanley recently announced a $5 million donation to the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, along with other inclusion efforts in the aftermath of the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Christensen argued that the firm has behaved hypocritically toward its own employees.
Booker spent most of her last decade at the investment firm leading its Urban Markets group, which focused on providing financial education to minority communities, according to the suit. She was supervised by a "virtual revolving door" of white bosses, which signaled the firm's lack of commitment to the minority-focused initiative, Christensen argued.
"[N]o one at Morgan Stanley truly cared about the diversity initiatives Ms. Booker spearheaded, nor felt compelled to be associated alongside her work," Christensen wrote. "Morgan Stanley intended on doing nothing more than to pay lip service to its supposed commitment to helping minority communities or minority employees."
Booker was "blindsided" in December 2019 when she was told that her position was being eliminated, according to the suit, and the sudden news came soon after she had complained about the "systemic mistreatment" of low-ranking black employees at the firm.
Christensen argued that Booker was far from alone in being underpaid and underappreciated, and the suit includes claims under the Equal Pay Act alleging that black women received lower hourly pay, bonuses and opportunities compared to men, especially white men.
The number of black employees in managerial and leadership roles at Morgan Stanley has actually decreased in the past 15 years, Christensen argued.
"Morgan Stanley has had decades to get its house in order and improve its record on diversity and inclusion," she said in a statement. "No more excuses. The numbers speak for themselves and Morgan Stanley must be held accountable for looking the other way."
The suit also called on Morgan Stanley to eliminate mandatory arbitration for discrimination claims, though Booker is not personally subject to a binding arbitration clause, Christensen argued.
In a statement, a Morgan Stanley spokesman said the firm rejects the allegations.
'"We strongly reject the allegations made in this claim and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in the appropriate forum," the statement said. "We are steadfast in our commitment to improve the diversity of our employees and have made steady progress—while recognizing that we have further progress to make. We will continue to advance our high priority efforts to achieve a more diverse and inclusive firm."
The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Kiyo Matsumoto of the Eastern District of New York, according to court papers.
READ MORE:
Sign up for Law.com's Legal Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits in a free, personalized news feed. Track class actions and who's getting the work by industry, practice area, law firm, company and region.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Told Archegos Founder Can't Afford What Defense Says Is 'Unjustified' $10 Billion Restitution
Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute readUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
SEC Under Trump 2.0 Likely to Take More 'Measured' Enforcement Approach, Observers Say
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 2Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
- 3Spencer Lawton, Savannah Prosecutor Who Tried ‘Midnight in the Garden’ Case, Dies at 81
- 4Uber Not Responsible for Turning Over Information on 'Dangerous Riders' to Competitor, Judge Finds
- 5Steve Bannon 'We Build The Wall' Fraud Trial Pushed to February 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250