City Bar Calls For Investigation Following Arrests of Legal Observers During Bronx Protests
In a statement, the City Bar said it was "gravely concerned" by what it called "concerted efforts" in New York, and across the country, to interfere with the work of observers at mass demonstrations protesting systemic racism and police killings of black Americans.
June 17, 2020 at 06:06 PM
4 minute read
The New York City Bar Association on Wednesday called on Mayor Bill de Blasio and the New York Police Department to "immediately investigate" the alleged targeting of nine legal observers earlier this month during a protest against police brutality in the Bronx.
In a statement, the City Bar said it was "gravely concerned" by what it called "concerted efforts" in New York, and across the country, to interfere with the work of observers at mass demonstrations protesting systemic racism and police killings of black Americans.
The City Bar specifically cited reports that legal observers associated with the National Lawyers Guild had been pulled out of a crowd in the Bronx, restrained with zip-tie cuffs and detained for 20 minutes. Some officers, the City Bar said, had "illegally accessed" the observers' privileged documents and took down their personal information, while claiming not to know the function they were serving at the protests.
Legal observers, who wear neon green hats to signal their status, are neutral third-party witnesses tasked with monitoring police conduct at protests and advising demonstrators of their rights if they are arrested. In New York, the NYPD's patrol manual recognizes their role in recording police activity, and instructs officers not to "[t]hreaten, intimidate, or otherwise discourage an observer from recording the police officer's activities," the City Bar said.
The alleged attacks, the statement said, highlighted a "failure" to adequately train officers serving on crowd-control details and a "startling disregard by police forces that their conduct is governed in our society by the rule of law."
"The City Bar strongly condemns all attacks on legal observers and urges state and local governments, police chiefs, and police unions both to advise their officers that attacks on legal observers are not tolerated, and also to swiftly investigate any incident involving the detention or use of force against a legal observer, and where warranted, prosecute offenders," the City Bar said.
The statement continued: "As protests and other demonstrations continue, the City Bar specifically calls on Mayor Bill de Blasio and Police Commissioner Dermot Shea to immediately investigate the incident in the Bronx, and for all officers in the NYPD to be made aware that the consequences of any illegal targeting of legal observers by police will be swift and severe, including appropriate disciplinary charges and criminal prosecution."
News outlets in New York began reporting the alleged targeting of legal observers by police on June 5, after de Blasio had implemented an 8 p.m. curfew in response to incidents of violence and looting amid protests following the killing of George Floyd while in police custody in Minneapolis. Like credentialed journalists and medical workers, legal observers were exempted from the mayor's order.
The president of the New York City chapter of the National Lawyers Guild in a June 7 letter demanded that Shea discipline officers who searched and detained legal observers the previous week.
According to the letter, police were given the go-ahead to arrest and "round up all the green hats" during a protest in Mott Haven. In some cases, the observers were "kettled" in with protesters and thrown to the ground before being arrested.
De Blasio on June 9 condemned the arrests of legal observers, saying "I will not accept that from the NYPD, if they are in any way violating those very essential rules of a free society," according to Politico.
The City Bar noted that similar incidents have been occurring outside New York as well, with reports that legal observers had been targets of controversial kettling tactics, tear gas, pepper spray and rubber bullets.
Protests sparked by Floyd's death, now in their third week, have already led to a suite of police reforms, including increased accountability and the repeal of a New York state law that had been criticized for shielding officers accused of misconduct.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 2Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 3Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 4Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
- 5The Law Firm Disrupted: It's Bonus Time
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250