City Bar Asks All Lawyers to Get Behind Mental Health and Substance Use CLE Requirement
New York would be following six other states that already have some type of "stand-alone" mental health/substance use continuing legal education requirement, according to a 9-page report issued by the bar association about its recommendation.
June 19, 2020 at 06:24 PM
3 minute read
In an attempt to formalize the need for state lawyers to address well-documented mental health and substance abuse problems that riddle the profession, the New York City Bar Association is urging the creation of a required mental health/substance use CLE credit hour, on a biennial basis, for all New York attorneys.
New York would be following six other states that already have some type of "stand-alone" mental health/substance use continuing legal education requirement, according to a 9-page report issued Thursday by the bar association about its recommendation and why it is needed.
Moreover, in 2017 the American Bar Association amended its Model Rule for Minimum Continuing Legal Education to include one hour of mental health/substance-use disorder programming every three years, noted the city bar association.
In the report, which was penned by the bar association's lawyer assistance program and mental health law committees, the two committees wrote that the proposed one-hour CLE requirement "would go a long way toward providing much-needed information and support to legal professionals licensed to practice in the state, and to the institutions and organizations for which they work."
In addition, said both the report and an accompanying news release, Eileen Travis, the bar association's lawyer assistance program executive director, has noted an "exponential increase [in recent years] in the number of requests from law schools, law firms, and the judiciary for presentations and training sessions on these [mental health and substance use] issues."
Travis also has pointed out that "while substance use is a major concern that has garnered significant attention in recent years, even more lawyers suffer from mental health disorders (or substance use with co-occurring undiagnosed and/or untreated mental health disorders)—including stress, suicidal ideation, bipolar disorder or depression—and that such problems are sometimes more difficult to detect and address."
Indeed, the report reminds lawyer-readers, in multiple ways, of how well-established the problems of mental health and substance abuse are in the profession. For example, the report notes a previously "largely anecdotal and regional understanding and handling of these issues changed drastically in 2016, when a study commissioned by the American Bar Association, in conjunction with the Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation—'The Prevalence of Substance Use and Other Mental Health Concerns Among American Attorneys'—was published in the Journal of Addiction Medicine."
"This data-driven statistical research report brought the widespread and pervasive problems of mental health, substance use, and lawyer well-being into sharp focus and has captured the public's attention," the report also said.
The city bar also notes that there are already in existence mental health and substance use CLE programs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250