Ex-Legal Assistant Levies Bias, Harassment Claims Against White & Case
Hannah Kim, who worked in the restructuring department in the firm's New York office, alleges she was the subject of an enduring harassment campaign by two supervisors after she returned from leave.
June 19, 2020 at 05:24 PM
3 minute read
A former White & Case senior legal assistant has accused the firm of pregnancy discrimination and claims it denied her wages and vacation pay following her February departure.
In a complaint filed in Manhattan state court Thursday, Hannah Kim, who started working in the firm's restructuring group in 2013, alleges a pattern of harassment by her two supervisors on her return from maternity leave in 2016, as well as a string of inappropriate comments by the leader of the practice before she went on leave.
Kim also said her supervisors failed to make proper accommodations for her after she suffered a brain injury from a 2018 automobile accident. In addition to the firm, the suit names longtime White & Case director of legal assistants Carol Grajeda and employee Rita Masino as defendants.
"Plaintiff was subject to severe harassment by the individual defendants as a result of her need to express milk while at the office," Kim said in the complaint. "This harassment was continuous and ongoing until Plaintiff stopped expressing milk for her child at work in approximately the fall of 2018."
Kim, who is represented by Kara Miller of New York employment boutique Virginia & Ambinder, details how she was allegedly barred from using the lactation room at the firm's New York office because of its distance from her own office. Instead, she had a latch hook attached to her door to ensure privacy while pumping. But she said that Grajeda would repeatedly try to open the door while she was in the process, while Masino would regularly use the phone to interrupt her, citing immediate needs that turned out to be trivial.
Masino allegedly made critical comments about breastfeeding, stating Kim's son was now a "grown-ass boy," that breastfeeding was "hink," and that "formula was invented for a reason." She also allegedly critiqued the appearance of Kim's breasts and disparaged her nursing bras.
Kim also said that both women repeatedly cautioned her against getting pregnant again, with both suggesting that she "keep her legs closed" and Masino intimating that Grajeda would find a way to fire her if she did.
Kim also said that a former uat the firm discussed his wife's pregnancy and labor and the effect of childbirth on women's bodies in a manner that made her uncomfortable, even after she'd told him so.
And she said that she was the recipient of harassment from Grajeda and Masino after she returned to the office after the car accident, following a fight about accommodations to work part time from home as she recovered.
Kim voluntarily left the firm in February after she was denied a bonus in 2019 and saw her year-end review repeatedly postponed, which she described as signs that she was going to be terminated. But she says she's yet to receive payment for her last scheduled paycheck as well as unused vacation days.
A spokesman for White & Case, where the complaint says Grajeda and Masino are still employed, declined to comment on the suit Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Secret Litigation: How Will AI Innovations Likely Be Litigated?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250