Increased Charitable Tax Incentives—The CARES Act
In his Estate Planning and Philanthropy column, Conrad Teitell discusses how non-itemizers (those taking the standard deduction) may deduct up to $300 of cash gifts to publicly supported charities (other than Donor Advised Funds and Supporting Organizations) in 2020.
June 19, 2020 at 11:40 AM
3 minute read
Non-itemizers (those taking the standard deduction) may deduct up to $300 of cash gifts to publicly supported charities (other than Donor Advised Funds and Supporting Organizations). This is for 2020 only.
Tax "experts" disagreed whether $600 could be deducted on a joint return. And the answer is: only up to $300 on a joint return. The staff of the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation in its 108-page "Description of the Tax Provisions of the CARES Act" (page 21, footnote 76) states the deduction is limited to $300 on a joint return. The staff reports are often described as "The Blue Book." Back in the dark ages, the printed copies had blue covers; hence the name.
Is the Blue Book "authority"? Not according to the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Woods, 134 S. CT. 557, 568 (2013): "… the Blue Book, like a law review article, may be relevant to the extent it is persuasive."
What should your clients do? I don't give advice in this column. So all I'll say is every client is entitled to his or her decade in court—and it's a long way to certiorari.
Itemizers' Charitable Deduction Ceiling for 2020 Cash Gifts Increased to 100 Percent of AGI:
- Qualifying charities are public charities except Donor Advised Funds (DAFs) and Supporting Organizations. This increase to 100% of AGI is up from 60 percent of AGI. And it's for 2020 only.
- Existing wrinkle. Starting in 2018, the AGI ceiling for cash gifts is 60 percent of AGI (up from 50 percent of AGI). However, due to a drafting error, many believe the 60 percent (instead of the previous 50 percent) of AGI ceiling applies if the donor makes only cash gifts in the year. But this issue doesn't apply in 2020. Thus, the deductibility ceiling for cash gifts in 2020 is 100 percent of AGI even though the donor makes non-cash gifts in 2020.
- Cash gifts made before 2020 and being carried over to 2020 don't qualify for the 100 percent of AGI ceiling. To qualify for the unlimited 100 percent of AGI cash-gift deductibility ceiling, the gifts must be made in 2020.
- For cash gifts exceeding 100 percent of AGI in 2020, the "excess" can be carried over to subsequent years. But the earlier percentage of AGI limits will apply.
- Presumably, IRS will issue guidance on how to claim the 100 percent of AGI deductibility ceiling.
Corporate Cash Gifts In 2020. The charitable deduction ceiling is increased from 10% to 25% of taxable income. CARES Act (Pub. L.116-136, §2205(a)(2)(B)). The increased ceiling must be elected. Presumably, IRS will issue guidance.
And that dear readers, is the news from Lake Taxbegone.
Conrad Teitell is a principal at Cummings & Lockwood in Stamford, Conn.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250