NYC Law Firms Officially Cleared for June 22 Reopening, Cuomo Says
New York City is the last part of the state to enter phase two of the reopening plan, but the move is still a dramatic turnaround for a city once at the epicenter of the nation's COVID-19 crisis.
June 19, 2020 at 01:59 PM
3 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Friday confirmed that New York City law firms would be able to return to in-office work starting June 22 as coronavirus business restrictions are loosened for the area.
He said experts have reviewed COVID-19 data and have given the city the greenlight to move into phase two of the state's reopening scheme June 22. That phase allows companies to bring back office-based jobs, real estate services and in-store shopping in the city.
Outdoor dining is also permitted in phase two, if all staff wear face masks, the tables are six feet apart, and customers wear face masks when they're not seated.
New York City is the last part of the state to enter phase two of the reopening plan, but the move is still a dramatic turnaround for a city once at the epicenter of the nation's COVID-19 crisis.
The percentage of positive COVID-19 tests in New York City over a rolling average remains low overall, officials reported days ago. Those numbers come even though construction, agriculture and manufacturing operations were allowed to open up and there were mass gatherings to protest police brutality and the killing of Black Americans by law enforcement.
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio estimated as many as 300,000 employees could come into the city for their jobs with phase two, which he described as the biggest of the four reopening phases.
Earlier on in the pandemic, New York issued sweeping COVID-19 lockdown measures that banned all nonessential gatherings and ordered nonessential employees to stay away from their workplaces. Officials have gradually relaxed those restrictions on a regional basis as the intensity of the outbreak has waned in New York.
Despite the low COVID-19 figures, Cuomo has cautioned in recent days that businesses must follow the guidelines aimed at preventing infections.
"We have done this in every region across the state. It has worked overall," he said Thursday. "I can tell you from experience, it works better or worse depending on the compliance and the enforcement and how people follow the rules."
For law firms, that means mandatory guidelines on physical distancing, protective equipment, disinfection and health screenings. Specifically, mandatory guidelines released by the state require shared workstations to be disinfected between users. It also orders workers to wear face masks when they come within six feet of another person.
There should be health screenings for workers too, including asking about COVID-19 symptoms and contact with a confirmed or suspected coronavirus case in the last two weeks, according to the guidelines.
READ MORE:
NYC Law Firms Could Be Allowed to Reopen Offices Next Week
Long Island, Mid-Hudson Law Firms Cleared to Reopen Offices
How Can Law Firms Safely Reopen? New York Bar Group to Make Recommendations
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250