Settlement in Palm Steakhouse Lawsuit Will Total $12M to $18M, Ending Long-Running Dispute
The Palm chain and its intellectual property were sold in a $45 million deal to the Houston-based company Landry's in March, just days before restaurants across the United States shut down because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The timing was fortunate for the plaintiffs, Newman said.
June 19, 2020 at 04:42 PM
3 minute read
A long-running family dispute over The Palm Restaurant chain reached a settlement expected to total $12 million to $18 million this week, signaling an end to years of litigation in New York between the two families whose Italian immigrant ancestors founded the first Palm on Manhattan's Second Avenue in 1926.
The bulk of the settlement is slated to go to Gary Ganzi and Claire Ganzi Breen, who sued the Palm's majority shareholders, Walter Ganzi Jr. and Bruce Bozzi Sr., in 2012. The court approval process for the settlement is set to begin Monday, with the entire process projected to finish in the fourth quarter of 2020, the plaintiffs' attorney, Fred Newman of Hoguet Newman Regal & Kenney, said Friday.
Bankruptcy proceedings for Bozzi, Walter Ganzi Jr., and two holding companies associated with the Palm are ongoing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida. A spokeswoman for Kasowitz Benson Torres, which has represented the defendants in their New York case, did not respond to a request for comment Friday.
Newman described the outcome as bittersweet for his clients, who are cousins with defendant Walter Ganzi Jr. Bozzi is a descendant of the other founder of the Palm.
"We are happy that the eight years of litigation is finally over and that they will receive a fair payment, but our clients are unhappy that the family has now lost its inheritance," Newman said, referring to the Palm and its long history.
The Palm chain and its intellectual property were sold in a $45 million deal to the Houston-based company Landry's in March, just days before restaurants across the United States shut down due to the pandemic. The timing was fortunate for the plaintiffs, Newman said.
"Landry's is a fabulous organization and when the pandemic is over, I have no doubt they will resurrect the Palm restaurant and return it to its prior glory," he said.
In November 2018, New York County Supreme Court Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley awarded more than $120 million to the plaintiffs in the intellectual property case. A year later, she ordered Bozzi and Walter Ganzi Jr. to pay $4.5 million in legal fees to Hoguet Newman.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readWalmart Accused of Misrepresenting 'Cheese' Ingredients in Great Value's Macaroni & Cheese
3 minute read'Ill-Gotten Gains'?: Cadwalader Alleges Beef Price-Fixing Conspiracy Hurts McDonald's
2 minute readGot 'Flat' Milk?: NY Company Says German Ex-Partner Stole Flat-Food Trade Secrets
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.