NYPD Commissioner Testifies Before AG James on Protest Response, Treatment of Legal Observers
NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea's testimony followed 17 hours of testimony June 17 and 18 from members of the public, elected officials and community organizations, many of whom said they witnessed or experienced violent responses from the police.
June 22, 2020 at 06:37 PM
4 minute read
During testimony before New York State Attorney General Letitia James on Monday, New York City Police Department Commissioner Dermot Shea defended the police department's response—including some incidents that have been described as provocative—to protests for racial justice and against police brutality in recent weeks.
Shea described the protests as different from others he'd encountered.
"This was some of the worst rioting that occurred in this city in recent memory," he said.
More than 100 NYPD officers were injured so badly that they have yet to return to duty, he said, and members of the force feel "underappreciated."
Shea's testimony followed 17 hours of testimony June 17 and 18 from members of the public, elected officials and community organizations, many of whom said they witnessed or experienced violent responses from the police. One recalled hearing bones crack, while others watched officers in riot gear rush peaceful protesters.
Andy Izenson, president of the New York City chapter of the National Lawyers Guild, testified that the NYPD engaged in "alarming and unlawful police practices and flagrant, blanket violations of constitutional rights" against protesters, along with allegedly violating the police department's own patrol guide, which describes the purpose and rights of legal observers.
Several other people also testified that they saw legal observers, who were exempt from the citywide curfew, being mistreated during the protests. A group of legal observers were detained and their privileged notes were searched during a June 4 protest in the Bronx, despite wearing the bright green hats that have long been the identifying mark of a legal observer, according to NLG-NYC.
When James asked about that incident, Shea said he would have to "see how you're defining legal observers."
"Having a shirt or a hat that says 'legal observer' does not mean that person is an attorney, does not mean that they're actually performing any legal function," he said.
Shea said multiple investigations are ongoing after an NYPD van appeared to drive into a crowd of protesters on Flatbush Avenue in Brooklyn. When James asked if the incident violated the NYPD's use-of-force policy, Shea said "no."
"I'm not saying the police car was used as a use of force," he said. "I am saying that the officers were set upon and attacked and thankfully they were able to get out of that situation with, to my knowledge, no injuries to anyone."
Shea condemned some alleged behavior by officers, including the covering of shield numbers with black mourning bands. Officers are allowed to wear the bands, he said, but he urged anyone who sees a shield number covered to report it to NYPD's Internal Affairs Bureau.
James also asked why officers were seen without masks. Shea said the importance of mask-wearing is stressed "constantly." There were some times when the officers likely had their masks off for a reason and other times when they should have been wearing them, he said.
An incident in which an officer apparently lifted someone's mask only to use pepper spray in their face was "completely inappropriate," Shea said.
Shea emphasized that the department tried to be flexible in how it policed the protests and that department leaders are now trying to move quickly to discipline officers where necessary. Fewer than 10 have been disciplined so far, he said.
One officer, Vincent D'Andraia, has been arrested and charged with assault, among other offenses, after allegedly shoving a woman to the ground in Brooklyn.
"The video speaks for itself," Shea said. "I was very disturbed by that."
READ MORE:
NYC Protesters Share Police Violence Stories at AG James' Virtual Public Hearing
New York Lawmakers Repeal Law That Kept Police Disciplinary Records Secret
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250