Plaintiff's Attorney Quits Davis Polk Racial Discrimination Lawsuit
Martin Restituyo asked to leave ex-Davis Polk associate Kaloma Cardwell's legal team due to irreconcilable differences in legal strategy, as well as saying Cardwell hasn't been paying his legal fees.
June 23, 2020 at 07:04 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in Manhattan on Tuesday allowed one of the lawyers representing a former Davis Polk & Wardwell associate who has sued the firm for racial discrimination to withdraw from the case.
The decision from U.S. District Judge Gregory Woods of the Southern District of New York comes in the wake of dueling filings over Davis Polk's request to dismiss most of the lawsuit filed by Kaloma Cardwell. Davis Polk is asserting that a portion of Cardwell's claims are either time-barred or don't pass muster. Woods gave no indication of when he would rule on the firm's motion during a half hour-long conference call Tuesday afternoon.
Instead, Woods' remarks were almost entirely focused on Martin Restituyo's request to quit representing Cardwell due to irreconcilable differences over legal strategy, and alleging Cardwell hasn't been paying legal fees. David Jeffries, Restituyo's now-former co-counsel in the case, said Cardwell also wished to terminate the relationship.
"The deterioration of the attorney-client relationship is enough to grant it," Woods said.
Restituyo alleged Cardwell hasn't paid any other legal fees outside of his retainer in November 2018. But Jeffries took issue with Restituyo's remarks about legal fees, saying that "from the standpoint of confronting the public record, I would simply state there would be more backstory."
Restituyo and Jeffries did not elaborate on the disagreements further, and did not respond to requests for comment as of press time. Woods said he had "no basis to do anything" but accept Restituyo's sworn statements, which was also adequate to support ending his representation of Cardwell.
Davis Polk had no objection to Restituyo's motion to withdraw from the case, but Bruce Birenboim, a Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison partner representing the firm, said they were having discovery issues with Cardwell and questioned whether those issues played a role in Restituyo's withdrawal.
"There has been a complete failure on plaintiffs' part to participate in discovery, which is not ripe for today—I think it will be soon—but that may or may not be a reason for counsel's application," Birenboim said.
Woods urged the parties to be mindful of the discovery deadlines in the case—which are set for September and December—and told them to bring their disputes to him promptly.
Despite his withdrawal from the case, Restituyo indicated to Woods this wouldn't be the end of his relationship with Jeffries, whom he called a brother. Jeffries, a former prosecutor, is an of counsel to Restituyo's firm, the Law Offices of Martin E. Restituyo.
Davis Polk did not respond to a request for comment as of press time.
|Read More
Davis Polk Doubles Down Against Ex-Associate in Race Bias Suit, Citing 'Deficient' Performance
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250