Attorney Accused of Firebombing NYPD Vehicle Responds to Supporters During Arraignment
Urooj Rahman, who worked as a tenants' attorney in Bronx Housing Court before her arrest, pleaded not guilty before U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Cheryl Pollak of the Eastern District of New York during a brief hearing plagued by background noise, as has become commonplace in virtual court appearances.
June 29, 2020 at 12:23 PM
3 minute read
Dozens, if not hundreds, of friends and family members dialed into the conference-call arraignment Monday of attorney Urooj Rahman, who has been indicted on charges of arson and use of explosives, among other offenses, in connection with the May 30 Molotov cocktail attack on an unoccupied New York City Police Department vehicle in Brooklyn.
Rahman, who worked as a tenants' attorney in Bronx Housing Court before her arrest, pleaded not guilty before U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Cheryl Pollak of the Eastern District of New York during a brief hearing plagued by background noise, as has become commonplace in virtual court appearances.
While the conference call line was active before and after the arraignment, Rahman's supporters spoke out, just as her co-defendant Colinford Mattis' supporters did during his arraignment Wednesday.
"Love you Urooj, we're all here," one voice said before Pollak's clerk reminded everyone to mute their phones ahead of the arraignment.
"Love you Urooj, stay strong," another voice said.
Rahman, who has been in Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center since a panel of judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted prosecutors' request for an emergency stay of the district court's decision to release Rahman and Mattis to home confinement on $250,000 bond, responded in a calm voice.
"I love you guys," she said.
When the arraignment was adjourned, a fresh wave of voices expressed love and support for Rahman.
"Praying for you every day," one said.
Rahman's attorneys, including Paul Shechtman of Bracewell, have informed the court that Rahman lived with and cared for her mother prior to her arrest. Her mother appeared to be one of the participants in the call, saying "Love you" over and over.
"Love you, Mom," Rahman responded at least twice.
The Second Circuit is still weighing whether to uphold the ruling from U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie of the Eastern District of New York that Mattis and Rahman can be released from the MDC. A group of former federal prosecutors and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers have each joined the case as amicus curiae to argue for Mattis and Rahman's release on the basis that the government's argument would upend existing bail practice.
The pair is also the subject of an open letter from more than 850 current and former students, faculty, staff and student organizations at New York University School of Law, from which Mattis graduated in 2016.
"We the undersigned stand with Colin and Urooj and call on the federal government to drop these politically motivated charges and their aggressive pursuit of detention without bail," the group wrote in their letter.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
SEC Under Trump 2.0 Likely to Take More 'Measured' Enforcement Approach, Observers Say
Decision of the Day: Attorney in Social Security Case Awarded Fees, But Must Pay Client Refund Under Equal Access to Justice Act
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250