Judge Issues Temporary Restraining Order in Lawsuit to Block Publication of Trump Niece's Book
A Dutchess County Supreme Court justice on Tuesday granted a temporary restraining order blocking President Donald Trump's niece Mary Trump and her publisher Simon & Schuster from publishing, printing or distributing any portion of her upcoming book about the president.
June 30, 2020 at 01:41 PM
4 minute read
A Dutchess County Supreme Court justice on Tuesday issued a temporary restraining order blocking President Donald Trump's niece Mary Trump and her publisher Simon & Schuster from publishing, printing or distributing any portion of her upcoming book about the president's family relationships.
Justice Hal Greenwald set deadlines for each side to submit their arguments in the next 10 days, ahead of the scheduled publication of Mary Trump's book, "Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man," on July 28.
Within hours of the order, attorneys for Mary Trump and Simon & Schuster filed notice that they were appealing to the Supreme Court Appellate Division, Second Department.
The president's brother Robert Trump sued his niece June 26, arguing that a confidentiality agreement associated with the will of Mary Trump's grandfather Fred Trump prevents her from publishing anything about her relationship with the president, Robert Trump or their sister, former Judge Maryanne Trump Barry of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
In a letter to Greenwald on June 26, Robert Trump's attorney Charles Harder argued that publishing lead times meant that bookstores and reviewers could receive copies of Mary Trump's book "any day now." He drew an analogy to the recent case of former national security adviser John Bolton, who was sued by the attorneys in the civil division of the U.S. Department of Justice days before his book's planned release.
"Plaintiff is seeking to avoid the situation presented in the recent case of United States v. Bolton … where the Court held that even though the government had established that Mr. Bolton violated his contractual obligations in publishing his book, no injunction could issue because while the book had not yet been released, it had been distributed and numerous people had access to copies of the book," Harder wrote.
Simon & Schuster is the publisher of both Bolton's book and Mary Trump's, Harder noted.
In their own letters to Greenwald on June 26, Mary Trump's attorney Anne Champion of Gibson Dunn and Simon & Schuster's attorney Elizabeth McNamara of Davis Wright Tremaine argued that Harder's TRO application infringed on Mary Trump's First Amendment rights.
In a statement Tuesday, Theodore Boutrous Jr., also a Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partner and a member of Mary Trump's legal team, echoed that argument.
"The trial court's temporary restraining order is only temporary but it still is a prior restraint on core political speech that flatly violates the First Amendment … This book, which addresses matters of great public concern and importance about a sitting president in an election year, should not be suppressed even for one day," he said.
In a statement Tuesday, Harder said Robert Trump is pleased with Greenwald's order.
"The actions of Mary Trump and Simon & Schuster are truly reprehensible," Harder said. "We look forward to vigorously litigating this case, and will seek the maximum remedies available by law for the enormous damages caused by Mary Trump's breach of contract and Simon & Schuster's intentional interference with that contract. Short of corrective action to immediately cease their egregious conduct, we will pursue this case to the very end."
READ MORE:
President Donald Trump's Brother Files New Suit Against Niece to Block Book on Family Relationships
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
- 2Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
- 3Divided Eighth Circuit Sides With GE's Timely Removal of Indemnification Action to Federal Court
- 4Former U.S. Dept. of Education Attorney Suspended for Failure to Complete CLE Credits
- 5ArentFox Schiff Adds Global Complex Litigation Partner in Los Angeles
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250