Prosecutors Seek February Trial, as Halkbank Asks for More Time to Prepare Defense in Iran Sanctions-Busting Case
Halkbank's attorneys plan to proceed with a planned motion to have Berman recuse himself from the case, Williams & Connolly partner Robert Cary said Tuesday. But, he warned, trial preparation presented a host of practical concerns, including the defense team's ability to physically meet with its client.
June 30, 2020 at 12:37 PM
4 minute read
Manhattan federal prosecutors are eyeing a proposed February 2021 trial date in the criminal case accusing Halkbank, the Turkish state-run bank, of helping Iran evade billions of dollars in U.S. economic sanctions, as both sides remained at odds over scheduling given COVID-19 concerns.
Halkbank's Williams & Connolly attorneys told a federal judge Tuesday that the global pandemic had made travel to Turkey to meet with their client nearly impossible, and said they would need more time to sort through language issues and interview potential witnesses. They asked that trial in the case be set instead for March 2022.
The scheduling discussion came during a 9 a.m. video hearing before U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York, the first since Halkbank pleaded not guilty to conspiracy, bank fraud and money laundering charges in March. The New York Law Journal monitored audio of the call remotely.
Halkbank's attorneys plan to proceed with a planned motion to have Berman recuse himself from the case, Williams & Connolly partner Robert Cary said Tuesday. But, he warned, trial preparation presented a host of practical concerns, including the defense team's ability to physically meet with its client.
The "vast majority" of potential witnesses also resided abroad, and counsel would have to retain interpreters to work around language barriers, Cary argued in support of the elongated timeline.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Lockard, meanwhile, pushed for an expedited motion schedule that would prime the case for trial early next year. The government, he noted, had been pursuing related sanctions-busting prosecutions since 2015, and secured a 32-month prison sentence for Halkbank executive Mehmet Hakan Atilla following a trial in 2017.
"This is not a case where we are starting from scratch here on June 30, 2020," Lockard said.
Berman adjourned Tuesday's hearing with the trial date still unresolved.
The judge did, however, order Halkbank to file its recusal motion by July 14, saying he hoped to "move quickly" on the matter. Briefing on that motion was slated to wrap by Aug. 4, and papers on Halkbank's expected "facial challenge" to the October 2019 indictment were due by Sept. 7. It wasn't clear Tuesday whether either motion would require oral arguments.
Halkbank, which is majority-owned by the Turkish government, is accused of using a series of businesses and front companies in Iran, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates to transfer billions of dollars' worth of Iranian oil revenue in violation of prohibitions that barred Iran from accessing the U.S. financial system.
Prosecutors have said that high-ranking officials in Iran and Turkey allegedly participated in the scheme, and some officials took tens of millions of dollars in bribes to shield it from the scrutiny of U.S. regulators and banks.
Halkbank for months refused to respond to the indictment in Manhattan federal court, and its former King & Spalding attorneys instead sought permission to enter a special appearance on behalf of the bank for the "limited and special purpose" of challenging the court's jurisdiction. A federal appeals court blocked that move in February.
King & Spalding formally withdrew from the case in March.
Cary told Berman at a March 31 hearing that he had been hired to "turn over a new leaf" in the case, and entered a plea of not guilty on behalf of his client.
Halkbank has long considered a recusal motion based on unspecified comments that Berman made both in and outside of the courtroom, but the precise nature of that request remains unclear.
The bank is also represented by Simon Latcovich, David Aufhauser, Damayanti Desai and James Kirkpatrick of Williams & Connolly in Washington, D.C.
In total, nine defendants have been charged in the alleged Halkbank-linked scheme, including Reza Zarrab, the Turkish-Iranian gold trader who pleaded guilty and later testified against Atilla, who returned to Turkey last July after serving his sentence for conspiracy, money laundering and related convictions.
Read More:
Halkbank, Represented by Williams & Connolly, Pleads Not Guilty in Iran Sanctions-Busting Case
Halkbank Arraignment Delayed as King & Spalding Seeks Written Approval to Represent Bank
With King & Spalding Prepared to Enter Case, Halkbank Arraignment Nears as Judge Seeks Assurances
2nd Circuit Denies King & Spalding's Bid for Special Appearance in Halkbank Sanctions-Busting Case
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute readFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250