Siena College Poll Finds Broad Support for Police Reforms Among NY Voters, But Less for 'Defunding'
The poll, which comes in the wake of a flurry of lawmaking in Albany around police reform, also found that a majority of surveyed voters said the deaths of Rayshard Brooks and George Floyd "are part of a broader pattern of excessive police violence toward Black people."
June 30, 2020 at 02:26 PM
3 minute read
A new poll from Siena College shows wide support among New York voters for certain police reforms such as creating a national database on police misconduct. Yet most of the voters surveyed oppose the idea of "defunding" the police, according to the poll.
The poll released Tuesday, in the wake of a flurry of legislative activity in Albany around police reform, also found that a majority of surveyed voters said the deaths of Rayshard Brooks and George Floyd "are part of a broader pattern of excessive police violence toward Black people."
Floyd, a Black man, died after a white Minneapolis police officer pinned a knee on his neck as the man laid face down on the pavement. Following his death, there were protests across the U.S. against police brutality and the killing of Black Americans by law enforcement, sparking a national reckoning over the intersection of race and policing.
Eighty-four percent of those surveyed in the poll backed the creation of a national database of officer misconduct while 82% supported having mental health professionals respond with police to 911 calls on drug addiction, mental illness and homelessness. The measures received broad bipartisan support, according to the poll.
Of the voters surveyed, 81% also backed a federal measure to ban police choke holds, the poll reported.
The poll, which surveyed 806 registered voters in New York state, has an overall margin of error of 3.9%.
The poll comes after New York state politicians passed a series of police reform bills.
"By an overwhelming 80-13 percent margin, voters say the recently passed legislation—including a ban on chokeholds by police, making disciplinary measures public and having a special unit in the State Attorney General's office to investigate and prosecute civilian killings by police officers—will be good for New York," said Siena College pollster Steven Greenberg in a statement.
Lawmakers voted to repeal a decades-old law used to shield police disciplinary records from the public. Repeal supporters argued the past provision, which was known as 50-a for its spot in New York's Civil Rights Law, protected officers with a history of misconduct from public accountability.
The state Legislature also approved measures that ban police choke holds, reaffirm the right to record police activities and mandate body cameras for the New York State Police.
Despite broad support for certain police reforms, the poll found that 60% of those surveyed opposed defunding the police and 57% oppose reducing police department funding.
Defunding the police received strong opposition from Republicans, according to the poll. There was support among Black voters to lessen police department funding while white voters overall opposed the idea, according to the poll.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Which Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
- 2Two Tesla Shareholder Cases in Del. Chancery Court Consolidated
- 3Your Opinion Matters: Annual Managing Partner Survey
- 4Civility for the New Generation
- 5The Future of Law: Harnessing AI Without Compromising Integrity
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250