First Amendment Advocates Protest 'Extraordinary' Order Blocking Publication of Mary Trump's Book
An attorney for Simon & Schuster confirmed in court filings that Mary Trump informed the publisher she was the primary source of The New York Times investigation into the Trump family's tax records.
July 01, 2020 at 02:50 PM
4 minute read
First Amendment advocates fired back in court late Tuesday after a New York state judge granted President Donald Trump's brother a temporary restraining order halting the publication, printing and distribution of niece Mary Trump's book about the president.
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, the Association of American Publishers and PEN American Center submitted an amicus brief in Dutchess County Supreme Court opposing Robert Trump's motion for a preliminary injunction.
"Any restraint on publication of the book is an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech," the First Amendment groups wrote. "A restraint of just one day is an unacceptable affront to the First Amendment and Article 1, Section 8 of the New York Constitution—a restraint of more than a week, as this court has already ordered, is extraordinary."
Dutchess County Supreme Court Justice Hal Greenwald has set deadlines for both sides' written arguments in the next week, ahead of a planned July 28 publication date for Mary Trump's book, "Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man." Mary Trump and her co-defendant, publisher Simon & Schuster, have each filed a notice of appeal.
Simon & Schuster attorney Elizabeth McNamara of Davis Wright Tremaine emphasized the seriousness of prior restraints in a memorandum Wednesday, arguing Robert Trump has not demonstrated any public harm would come from the publication of the book.
In Robert Trump's complaint, filed Friday, attorney Charles Harder argued Mary Trump is bound by a confidentiality provision in the 2001 settlement agreement tied to her grandfather Fred Trump's will. Harder has argued that the case is not a First Amendment matter and is simply focused on breach of contract.
Simon & Schuster was not involved in the settlement of Fred Trump's will, and McNamara wrote that the publisher was not even aware of the contract until recently.
"There is, therefore, no cause of action asserted against Simon & Schuster and, as a consequence, no likelihood of success," McNamara wrote. "This failure to plead a cause of action bears emphasis—plaintiff is seeking to silence one of the most prominent American publishers without alleging that it engaged in any actual wrongdoing at all."
McNamara also argued the information in the book will not injure the president or Robert Trump, because accounts of the family's complicated relationships and Mary Trump's role in a New York Times report about Trump family taxes have already been published by news outlets.
Mary Trump revealed to Simon & Schuster during a meeting to discuss her book proposal that she was the primary source of the New York Times article, McNamara wrote. Mary Trump's role as the source was later reported by The Daily Beast.
"Learning that, and knowing that no litigation resulted from the NY Times Article, Simon & Schuster was entirely confident in Ms. Trump's ability to tell her story regarding her own family (given that over a year before she worked closely with The New York Times to tell key elements of this story)," McNamara wrote.
Robert Trump's lawsuit was filed shortly after former national security adviser John Bolton was sued by attorneys in the civil division of the U.S. Department of Justice, who sought to block his book about his time in the White House days before publication.
In that case, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth of the District of Columbia found that even though Bolton's book "likely jeopardized national security," the proverbial horse was "out of the barn" because review copies had been widely distributed.
Harder has used the Bolton example to urge the court to act quickly on Mary Trump's book, but McNamara argued that Lamberth's decision demonstrates the high bar required for an injunction. Simon & Schuster is the publisher of both books.
McNamara also argued that Simon & Schuster is also at risk of economic harm if it cannot fulfill purchase orders, which are numerous; the book was ranked first on Amazon's bestseller list as of Wednesday afternoon.
Read more:
Judge Issues Temporary Restraining Order in Lawsuit to Block Publication of Trump Niece's Book
President Donald Trump's Brother Files New Suit Against Niece to Block Book on Family Relationships
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 2Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 3Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
- 4Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
- 5Divided Eighth Circuit Sides With GE's Timely Removal of Indemnification Action to Federal Court
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250