Legal Services NYC, Orgs Press Marks on Pandemic Protections for Low-Income Foreclosure Litigants
Among the proposed changes, the letter called for improvements that would connect homeowners with legal services providers for settlement conferences and give pro se litigants greater access to court filings in e-filed cases.
July 01, 2020 at 05:45 PM
5 minute read
A group of New York City legal services providers are urging the Office of Court Administration to implement further measures to protect low- and moderate-income homeowners of color in foreclosure actions, as court operations resume following pandemic-related shutdowns.
In a June 24 letter to Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks, Legal Services NYC and 12 other legal-advocate organizations said they expected a surge of foreclosure actions as moratoriums and forbearance agreements meant to protect defendants are set to expire in the coming months.
The impact of that spike, Legal Services NYC said, would be particularly severe for lower-income minority communities, which have historically used the foreclosure process to "extract wealth from New York City's communities of color."
Among the proposed changes, the letter called for improvements that would connect homeowners with legal services providers for settlement conferences and give pro se litigants greater access to court filings in e-filed cases.
"Given the well-documented severity of the pandemic and associated economic impact on New York City's low- and moderate-income communities of color, which also bear the brunt of the economic dislocation associated with the pandemic as they did during the foreclosure crisis, it is especially important that the judiciary plan for resumption of foreclosure activity deliberately and with sensitivity to the particular need of litigants in these cases," Jacob Inwald, the director of Legal Services NYC's foreclosure prevention unit, wrote in the nine-page missive.
As of Wednesday afternoon, the organization said it had not yet received a response from Marks or his staff.
A spokesman for the OCA said that the office was reviewing the letter and new housing legislation to determine "what potential policy changes might be required."
"We expect to have some further guidance sometime next week," he said.
Inwald said that in the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis that resulted from the 2008 economic recession, advocates had secured a "host of consumer protections" for homeowners, including required notification before a foreclosure action is started, as well as mandatory settlement procedures that connect litigants with free legal services and give defendants additional opportunities to answer complaints.
In an interview, he said that Legal Services NYC was engaged in an "ongoing dialogue" with Marks about general concerns over the adjudication of foreclosure actions amid the judiciary's push to expedite cases.
However, more attention needed to be paid to the needs of unrepresented litigants who may not have access to remote services during the pandemic.
"We find that the judiciary needs consistent reminders that the world doesn't look like the people they usually interact with," Inwald said.
"Our biggest concern is that as the cases resume, they don't just go back to their old ways. The cases are going to be more severe now because we don't have the same ways to connect to clients," he said.
For presettlement conferences, Legal Services NYC proposed virtually replicating courthouse clinics that have connected homeowners with legal services providers to prevent the foreclosure process from reverting to "rubber-stamp" functions that result in home losses. Defendants, the group said, should be given uniform notices about the purpose of the conferences and their options for participating remotely.
The letter also urged courts to provide sterile spaces and equipment for litigants to appear remotely, and no defendant, it said, should be hit with a default for failing to appear.
It also called for pro se protections that would not require defendants to file papers in county clerks offices or to appear for a return date during the pandemic, "forcing litigants to choose between protecting their health and preserving their legal rights." The courts, Legal Services NYC said, should continue to adjourn all motions in cases involving pro se litigants, and discovery deadlines should be postponed indefinitely.
Inwald said that as foreclosure cases start to resume, a "new pipeline" of actions was expected "to mushroom in the coming months," and the courts urgently needed a plan in place connect those underserved defendants with legal representation and to preserve their rights.
He said, "What we're hoping for is to at least have a seat at the table."
Read More:
Legal Services NYC Asks 'Virtual Court' to Consider Underserved Pro Se Clients
First Department Going 'Virtual' to Reopen Operations, Attorney Admissions
New York Court System Plans to Relax Coronavirus Restrictions
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Florida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools
- 2Processes, Challenges and Solutions In Lateral Partner Integration
- 3Attorneys 'On the Move': Herrick Bolsters Tech Practice with IP Partner; Cozen O’Connor Adds Member to Its Fund Formation Group
- 4NJ Jury Awards $4.5M After Woman Trips on Carpet
- 5Blake Lively Is Sued by Texas Crisis Specialist in Latest 'It Ends With Us' Lawsuit
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250