Legal Services NYC, Orgs Press Marks on Pandemic Protections for Low-Income Foreclosure Litigants
Among the proposed changes, the letter called for improvements that would connect homeowners with legal services providers for settlement conferences and give pro se litigants greater access to court filings in e-filed cases.
July 01, 2020 at 05:45 PM
5 minute read
A group of New York City legal services providers are urging the Office of Court Administration to implement further measures to protect low- and moderate-income homeowners of color in foreclosure actions, as court operations resume following pandemic-related shutdowns.
In a June 24 letter to Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks, Legal Services NYC and 12 other legal-advocate organizations said they expected a surge of foreclosure actions as moratoriums and forbearance agreements meant to protect defendants are set to expire in the coming months.
The impact of that spike, Legal Services NYC said, would be particularly severe for lower-income minority communities, which have historically used the foreclosure process to "extract wealth from New York City's communities of color."
Among the proposed changes, the letter called for improvements that would connect homeowners with legal services providers for settlement conferences and give pro se litigants greater access to court filings in e-filed cases.
"Given the well-documented severity of the pandemic and associated economic impact on New York City's low- and moderate-income communities of color, which also bear the brunt of the economic dislocation associated with the pandemic as they did during the foreclosure crisis, it is especially important that the judiciary plan for resumption of foreclosure activity deliberately and with sensitivity to the particular need of litigants in these cases," Jacob Inwald, the director of Legal Services NYC's foreclosure prevention unit, wrote in the nine-page missive.
As of Wednesday afternoon, the organization said it had not yet received a response from Marks or his staff.
A spokesman for the OCA said that the office was reviewing the letter and new housing legislation to determine "what potential policy changes might be required."
"We expect to have some further guidance sometime next week," he said.
Inwald said that in the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis that resulted from the 2008 economic recession, advocates had secured a "host of consumer protections" for homeowners, including required notification before a foreclosure action is started, as well as mandatory settlement procedures that connect litigants with free legal services and give defendants additional opportunities to answer complaints.
In an interview, he said that Legal Services NYC was engaged in an "ongoing dialogue" with Marks about general concerns over the adjudication of foreclosure actions amid the judiciary's push to expedite cases.
However, more attention needed to be paid to the needs of unrepresented litigants who may not have access to remote services during the pandemic.
"We find that the judiciary needs consistent reminders that the world doesn't look like the people they usually interact with," Inwald said.
"Our biggest concern is that as the cases resume, they don't just go back to their old ways. The cases are going to be more severe now because we don't have the same ways to connect to clients," he said.
For presettlement conferences, Legal Services NYC proposed virtually replicating courthouse clinics that have connected homeowners with legal services providers to prevent the foreclosure process from reverting to "rubber-stamp" functions that result in home losses. Defendants, the group said, should be given uniform notices about the purpose of the conferences and their options for participating remotely.
The letter also urged courts to provide sterile spaces and equipment for litigants to appear remotely, and no defendant, it said, should be hit with a default for failing to appear.
It also called for pro se protections that would not require defendants to file papers in county clerks offices or to appear for a return date during the pandemic, "forcing litigants to choose between protecting their health and preserving their legal rights." The courts, Legal Services NYC said, should continue to adjourn all motions in cases involving pro se litigants, and discovery deadlines should be postponed indefinitely.
Inwald said that as foreclosure cases start to resume, a "new pipeline" of actions was expected "to mushroom in the coming months," and the courts urgently needed a plan in place connect those underserved defendants with legal representation and to preserve their rights.
He said, "What we're hoping for is to at least have a seat at the table."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250