Upstate NY Judge Appeared Biased Against Defendant, SCJC Says
The state disciplinary commission reported the determination Wednesday against Wayne Pebler, a justice for the Roxbury Town Court in Delaware County.
July 01, 2020 at 02:34 PM
3 minute read
The state's Commission on Judicial Conduct says an upstate New York judge should be censured for appearing biased against a defendant and making public comments about charges against him.
The state disciplinary commission reported the determination Wednesday against Wayne Pebler, a justice for the Roxbury Town Court in Delaware County.
Pebler, who agreed to the censure, is not an attorney and has served on the bench in the town court since 2002, the commission said.
The commission released a determination outlining Pebler's comments about the defendant, whom he knew from other criminal cases. The judge also worked at middle school in the 1990s where the defendant was a student.
In 2018, the court's audio recording system captured Pebler telling a man in the courtroom that the defendant was a "convict," according to the commission. The judge went on to describe what led to the charges against the defendant, the commission reports. The prosecutor and defense counsel were not present during the comments.
That same day, the judge complained the defendant "had children whom he could not afford to support," according to the determination.
Later that year at the Roxbury Town Court, Pebler made comments that implied he believed the defendant used drugs and was a drug dealer, even though the man had no drug-related charges pending at the town court at the time, according to the commission.
Pebler talked about a plea agreement tied to a pending case in another town court, according to the commission, and a recording system caught the judge saying the defendant was "dealing drugs and they don't seem to care."
"[Pebler] now recognizes that it was improper for him to speak with members of the public about the merits of pending cases and pledges to refrain from such conduct in the future," the commission said in its determination, noting the judge was cooperative with them.
The commission privately cautioned the judge in 2009 after they found he participated in ex parte communications. The judge's current term expires at the end of 2021, but the commission says he does not plan on seeking reelection.
"The courts must be and appear fair and impartial," said Commission Administrator Robert Tembeckjian in a statement. "For a judge to disparage a defendant in public conversation, prior to the adjudication of the case, undermines public confidence in the administration of justice."
An attorney for Pebler could not be reached Wednesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readSidley Austin Scores Landmark Civil Rights Verdict Against Prolonged Solitary Confinement in State Prisons
Cuomo Spokesman Sues Wigdor, Alleging Their Lawsuit on Behalf of Trooper Was 'Legally Baseless'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250