Upstate NY Judge Appeared Biased Against Defendant, SCJC Says
The state disciplinary commission reported the determination Wednesday against Wayne Pebler, a justice for the Roxbury Town Court in Delaware County.
July 01, 2020 at 02:34 PM
3 minute read
The state's Commission on Judicial Conduct says an upstate New York judge should be censured for appearing biased against a defendant and making public comments about charges against him.
The state disciplinary commission reported the determination Wednesday against Wayne Pebler, a justice for the Roxbury Town Court in Delaware County.
Pebler, who agreed to the censure, is not an attorney and has served on the bench in the town court since 2002, the commission said.
The commission released a determination outlining Pebler's comments about the defendant, whom he knew from other criminal cases. The judge also worked at middle school in the 1990s where the defendant was a student.
In 2018, the court's audio recording system captured Pebler telling a man in the courtroom that the defendant was a "convict," according to the commission. The judge went on to describe what led to the charges against the defendant, the commission reports. The prosecutor and defense counsel were not present during the comments.
That same day, the judge complained the defendant "had children whom he could not afford to support," according to the determination.
Later that year at the Roxbury Town Court, Pebler made comments that implied he believed the defendant used drugs and was a drug dealer, even though the man had no drug-related charges pending at the town court at the time, according to the commission.
Pebler talked about a plea agreement tied to a pending case in another town court, according to the commission, and a recording system caught the judge saying the defendant was "dealing drugs and they don't seem to care."
"[Pebler] now recognizes that it was improper for him to speak with members of the public about the merits of pending cases and pledges to refrain from such conduct in the future," the commission said in its determination, noting the judge was cooperative with them.
The commission privately cautioned the judge in 2009 after they found he participated in ex parte communications. The judge's current term expires at the end of 2021, but the commission says he does not plan on seeking reelection.
"The courts must be and appear fair and impartial," said Commission Administrator Robert Tembeckjian in a statement. "For a judge to disparage a defendant in public conversation, prior to the adjudication of the case, undermines public confidence in the administration of justice."
An attorney for Pebler could not be reached Wednesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250