Disciplinary Commission Says NY Judge Should Be Admonished Over Inappropriate Comments
During a conference in 2017 on a separate case, Gerber remarked that a defendant's daughter "was 'dressing for attention,' by which he meant 'for men to look at her,'" the commission reported.
July 02, 2020 at 03:30 PM
4 minute read
A state disciplinary commission has found that a town court justice in Rockland County made inappropriate comments and failed to disqualify himself from a case.
The state's Commission on Judicial Conduct on Thursday reported that Howard Gerber, a justice for the Clarkstown Town Court, should be admonished for the behavior.
Gerber, who agreed to the admonition, has served on the bench in the town court since 2007, the commission reports.
The commission found the judge made disparaging remarks about a probation department.
"Respondent now recognizes that he should have disqualified himself from [the case] after making the remarks," according to a determination from the commission.
During a conference, Gerber said he had problems with a probation department and said a department official was a "liar" who "perjured herself" while appearing before him in a previous matter, the commission reported.
During a conference in 2017 on a separate case, Gerber remarked that a defendant's daughter "was 'dressing for attention,' by which he meant 'for men to look at her,'" the commission reported.
After someone commented the daughter had worn yoga pants to court, the judge said "in words or substance to [a prosecutor]: 'I don't care what anybody wears … if you wear yoga pants to court, it's okay with me,'" according to the commission's determination.
"When [the prosecutor] did not respond, respondent said in words or substance, 'Oh, I should not have said that. Are there cameras in here?'" according to the determination.
In a separate incident when the judge was walking out of a courtroom, Gerber asked the prosecutor and her friend if they "want[ed] a room" and then offered "in words or substance to 'turn off the lights'" for them, according to the commission. The judge intended "to make an off-color joke," according to the determination.
The commission described the comments as "demeaning and inappropriate for a judge to make in a courtroom."
"We expect that [Gerber] has learned from this experience, will comply with his pledge to refrain from making inappropriate comments in the future and will act in accordance with his obligation to abide by all the Rules Governing Judicial Conduct," according to the commission's determination.
In a statement issued through an attorney, Gerber said he accepts their determination and his responsibility for his actions.
"I am keenly aware that it is my responsibility to avoid even the appearance of impropriety," he said in the statement. "I have learned from this unfortunate experience, and will endeavor to use such insight to further improve myself as a judge."
Commission Administrator Robert Tembeckjian issued a statement saying "there is no call for a judge to engage in sexual innuendo or make judgmental or juvenile remarks about the way women look or dress."
"Nor is it appropriate for a judge to preside over a matter in which he has gratuitously disparaged an essential participant," he said in the statement.
READ MORE:
Upstate NY Judge Delayed Decisions in Small Claims Cases, Judicial Conduct Commission Says
Upstate NY Judge Appeared Biased Against Defendant, SCJC Says
NY Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Man in Case Where Judge Took Over Witness Questioning
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250