New York's Visitor Quarantine Order Draws Legal Challenge From Arizona Woman
Last month, Cuomo announced that people entering New York from states with high coronavirus infection rates must quarantine for 14 days.
July 06, 2020 at 03:03 PM
4 minute read
A federal lawsuit is challenging Gov. Andrew Cuomo's authority to require people to quarantine if they come to New York from states with high coronavirus infection rates.
The litigation, filed in the federal Northern District of New York last week, was brought by an Arizona resident who planned to fly to New York to help pack up a home. The lawsuit says she had to cancel her plans because of the executive order from Cuomo.
Last month, the third-term governor announced that people entering New York from states with high coronavirus infection rates must quarantine for 14 days. The move was codified in an executive order, which stipulated that a violation of a quarantine or isolation order could lead to a $10,000 civil penalty.
The order applies to people traveling from states that exceed a certain coronavirus infection rate. As of last week, people entering New York from Florida, Texas, Arizona and California would be required to quarantine, along with other states.
"The State of New York is not an independent country," the lawsuit argues. "The Governor of New York does not have dictatorial powers that permit him to require healthy, law-abiding citizens to remain quarantined, which is akin to a house arrest, for 14 days as a condition on their right to freely travel in and through the State of New York."
The lawsuit argues the executive order violates the equal protection guarantee in the Fourteenth Amendment.
The restrictions from the executive order are "arbitrary, capricious, and irrational," according to the litigation. It argues that a person with the coronavirus can travel freely between New Jersey to New York, while a healthy person in Arizona would not be allowed to travel to New York without undergoing a 14-day quarantine.
Cuomo issued the order as some states saw record highs in new coronavirus cases for a single day and many other states witnessed overall upticks in new cases.
Dr. Howard Zucker, the state health commissioner, is listed as a defendant in the suit, along with Cuomo. The state's Department of Health has issued interim guidance for quarantine restrictions.
To safely quarantine, a person must not be in public and must have the ability to self-quarantine from others in the household as soon as symptoms develop, according to the document. It says food should be delivered to the person's quarantine quarters too.
States with an rising infection rate are a threat to New York and air travelers can bring the virus with them, Cuomo argued Monday.
"An outbreak anywhere is an outbreak everywhere. That's the new mentality we have to have," he said.
The suit follows several other legal challenges in recent months aimed at state-imposed restrictions spurred by the coronavirus pandemic. In one case, a suit brought by two priests and three Orthodox Jewish residents of Brooklyn challenged gathering limits.
Last month, a federal judge ordered New York officials to not enforce any outdoor gathering limitations, if people are following social-distancing requirements.
Earlier this year, the Cuomo administration did away with the state's near total ban on gatherings after a legal challenge from the New York Civil Liberties Union over exceptions made to the rule.
READ MORE:
NY, NJ and Conn. Tell Visitors From States With High Infection Rate to Quarantine
Cuomo Faces Federal Lawsuit Over COVID-19 Restrictions on Houses of Worship
NYC Law Firms Officially Cleared for June 22 Reopening, Cuomo Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250