New York's Visitor Quarantine Order Draws Legal Challenge From Arizona Woman
Last month, Cuomo announced that people entering New York from states with high coronavirus infection rates must quarantine for 14 days.
July 06, 2020 at 03:03 PM
4 minute read
A federal lawsuit is challenging Gov. Andrew Cuomo's authority to require people to quarantine if they come to New York from states with high coronavirus infection rates.
The litigation, filed in the federal Northern District of New York last week, was brought by an Arizona resident who planned to fly to New York to help pack up a home. The lawsuit says she had to cancel her plans because of the executive order from Cuomo.
Last month, the third-term governor announced that people entering New York from states with high coronavirus infection rates must quarantine for 14 days. The move was codified in an executive order, which stipulated that a violation of a quarantine or isolation order could lead to a $10,000 civil penalty.
The order applies to people traveling from states that exceed a certain coronavirus infection rate. As of last week, people entering New York from Florida, Texas, Arizona and California would be required to quarantine, along with other states.
"The State of New York is not an independent country," the lawsuit argues. "The Governor of New York does not have dictatorial powers that permit him to require healthy, law-abiding citizens to remain quarantined, which is akin to a house arrest, for 14 days as a condition on their right to freely travel in and through the State of New York."
The lawsuit argues the executive order violates the equal protection guarantee in the Fourteenth Amendment.
The restrictions from the executive order are "arbitrary, capricious, and irrational," according to the litigation. It argues that a person with the coronavirus can travel freely between New Jersey to New York, while a healthy person in Arizona would not be allowed to travel to New York without undergoing a 14-day quarantine.
Cuomo issued the order as some states saw record highs in new coronavirus cases for a single day and many other states witnessed overall upticks in new cases.
Dr. Howard Zucker, the state health commissioner, is listed as a defendant in the suit, along with Cuomo. The state's Department of Health has issued interim guidance for quarantine restrictions.
To safely quarantine, a person must not be in public and must have the ability to self-quarantine from others in the household as soon as symptoms develop, according to the document. It says food should be delivered to the person's quarantine quarters too.
States with an rising infection rate are a threat to New York and air travelers can bring the virus with them, Cuomo argued Monday.
"An outbreak anywhere is an outbreak everywhere. That's the new mentality we have to have," he said.
The suit follows several other legal challenges in recent months aimed at state-imposed restrictions spurred by the coronavirus pandemic. In one case, a suit brought by two priests and three Orthodox Jewish residents of Brooklyn challenged gathering limits.
Last month, a federal judge ordered New York officials to not enforce any outdoor gathering limitations, if people are following social-distancing requirements.
Earlier this year, the Cuomo administration did away with the state's near total ban on gatherings after a legal challenge from the New York Civil Liberties Union over exceptions made to the rule.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 2'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 3Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 4As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
- 5Managing Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250