Public Defenders Call on NY Courts to Reconsider In-Person Appearances During Reopening Process
In a statement, Office of Court Administration spokesman Lucian Chalfen said the courts are taking a conservative approach.
July 09, 2020 at 06:24 PM
4 minute read
A group of public defender organizations in New York City objected Thursday to the planned return of in-person court proceedings for nonemergency matters, which was announced Tuesday by Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks.
In the letter, The Legal Aid Society, Brooklyn Defender Services, the Bronx Defenders, the New York County Defender Services, the Queens Defenders and the Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem asked Marks to abandon the plan "until our experts have the opportunity to work together to develop plans and protocols for returning to Court in a safe manner and even then, only upon consent for cases where there are no better and safer options."
The resumption of in-person appearances in some matters is part of the court system's Phase Three, which began in New York City on Wednesday. While health checks are now required upon entry at courthouses and safety equipment such as acrylic barriers and markings to guide physical distancing are being added, the defender organizations argued that remote proceedings have been held "very successfully until now."
The courts are also not under legal pressure to reopen, they argued, as the right to a speedy trial remains suspended statewide.
"There is no specific reason that these mostly routine appearances should result in the endangerment of the health and well-being of anyone required to appear, including the parties and counsel," they wrote. "We adamantly oppose this plan and request that any calendared cases be adjourned and that no additional in-person matters be calendared at this time."
In a statement, Office of Court Administration spokesman Lucian Chalfen said the courts are taking a conservative approach.
"Any suggestion that we would endanger the health and welfare of our employees, attorneys, litigants, defendants, or the public is absurd," he said. "We are taking the most conservative, measured and deliberative approach to every action as we move to resume in-person court appearances,"
New York County Defender Services executive director Stan Germán said the defender community wanted to make sure public health experts were involved in the reopening decisions. Their hired expert, CrowdRx, has completed some courthouse visits but was still gathering information when the announcement came this week, Germán said.
The expert is examining issues like the safety of courthouse HVAC systems and intends to produce a report and consult with OCA's externally hired epidemiologist, Germán said.
"Our position is simply, let the experts finish their tours, issue their reports, let's follow their advice and come back slowly, safely and informed by the public health officials," he said.
While individual attorneys are able to raise health concerns with judges one by one, Germán said the defenders are particularly concerned about the risk to clients.
"It is well established that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a disproportionate impact on low-income Black and Brown people, the same community that is also disproportionately arrested and represented in court cases in NYC and will bear the brunt of this new policy," the letter said, adding that clients typically rely on public transportation to reach courthouses.
The idea of a client appearing in court while their defender participates on a video monitor is "untenable," Germán said.
Read more:
Grand Jury Summonses Will Be Sent Out as Phase Three Begins for NYC Courts
New York's 3rd, 9th and 10th Judicial Districts Beginning 'Phase 4′
NY State Court System Implements Temperature Screenings to Enter Buildings, DiFiore Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250