Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell Propose Release on $5 Million Bond, Home Confinement
Prosecutors in the Southern District of New York have argued that Maxwell should be detained while she awaits trial, describing the former British socialite and naturalized U.S. citizen as an "extreme" risk to flee the country.
July 10, 2020 at 02:02 PM
5 minute read
Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys on Friday asked for her release on $5 million bond, arguing that she has maintained communication with prosecutors and is at risk for COVID-19 if she remains confined in Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center.
Maxwell, the longtime confidante of Jeffrey Epstein, was arrested July 2 in New Hampshire and charged with helping the deceased financier run a sex trafficking ring involving girls as young as 14. Epstein died by suicide in Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center in August.
Prosecutors in the Southern District of New York have argued that Maxwell should be detained while she awaits trial, describing the former British socialite and naturalized U.S. citizen as an "extreme" risk to flee the country.
"In short, Maxwell has three passports, large sums of money, extensive international connections, and absolutely no reason to stay in the United States and face the possibility of a lengthy prison sentence," they wrote in a 10-page detention memo.
Maxwell's proposed $5 million bond would be co-signed by six people, including siblings and relatives, and would be secured by real property in the United Kingdom worth over $3.75 million, Maxwell's attorney Mark S. Cohen of Cohen & Gresser wrote.
According to the government's detention memo, Maxwell had more than 15 bank accounts that have held as much as $20 million since 2016. She had "effectively been hiding for approximately a year" at a 156-acre home in Bradford, New Hampshire, which she had acquired in an all-cash purchase through a "carefully anonymized LLC," prosecutors wrote.
As proposed by Maxwell's legal team, her conditions of release would include home confinement with electronic monitoring at a residence in the Southern District, surrender of her travel documents and restriction of travel to New York City and Long Island for court appearances and visits with her attorneys. Legal communication while Maxwell has been in the MDC has been a challenge, Cohen explained.
Her visitors would also be restricted to "immediate family, close friends and counsel," Cohen wrote, and Maxwell would have security guards whom she previously hired due to a "crushing onslaught" of media attention.
"Ms. Maxwell, for personal reasons, will continue to need security guards to protect her upon release," Cohen wrote. "Under the circumstances, if the Court requires it, the security guards could report to Pretrial Services."
Cohen argued that similar release conditions have been approved in other high-profile cases, including that of Ponzi scheme leader Bernard Madoff, and should be approved here.
Cohen also previewed the team's arguments in Maxwell's defense, including that her prosecution is barred by Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement with the Department of Justice and that several of the charges against her are time-barred.
"As we understand from the face of the indictment, the government's case is based primarily on the testimony of three individuals about events that allegedly occurred roughly 25 years ago between 1994 and 1997," Cohen wrote. "It is inherently more difficult to prosecute cases relating to decades-old conduct. These issues further call into question the strength of the government's case, and provide an independent basis justifying release on bail."
Cohen argued that Maxwell's decision to remain in the United States after Epstein's arrest shows that she does not present a risk of flight. She has been in contact with prosecutors and would have voluntarily surrendered if she had been asked to do so, he wrote, adding that travel restrictions related to coronavirus will inhibit her ability to flee.
Cohen disputed the idea, put forth by prosecutors, that Maxwell was "hiding" from the law when she dropped out of the public eye after Epstein's arrest. She was trying to protect herself and her friends and family from aggressive media attention, he wrote.
Maxwell similarly chose not to propose some family members and friends as co-signers to "safeguard their privacy and protect them and their families from harm," Cohen wrote. Some of Maxwell's close friends who had "nothing whatsoever to do with Epstein" have suffered severe reputational damage and even lost their jobs because they were associated with her, he wrote.
"The 'open season' declared on Ms. Maxwell after Epstein's death has come with an even darker cost—she has been the target of alarming physical threats, even death threats, and has had to hire security guards to ensure her safety," he wrote. "The media feeding frenzy, which has only intensified in recent months, has also deeply affected her family and friends."
Maxwell's legal team also includes Cohen's law partner Christian Everdell and Haddon, Morgan and Foreman attorneys Jeffrey Pagliuca and Laura Menninger, according to court papers.
The government's reply to Maxwell's proposal is due Monday, and her bail hearing will be held virtually Tuesday.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250