City Bar Says Trump Admin Uses COVID-19 to Illegally Block Asylum Seekers
The bar association's letter contends that since mid-March some 40,000 people, including asylum seekers and unaccompanied children, have been expelled at U.S.-Mexico and U.S.-Canada border processing centers under new administration policies that flout U.S. and international law.
July 10, 2020 at 05:58 AM
4 minute read
In a strongly worded letter, the New York City Bar Association is calling on the Trump administration to restore humanitarian and due process protections to asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico and U.S.-Canada borders who've allegedly been stripped of their legal rights by an administration misusing COVID-19 as a reason.
In a detailed, five-page letter addressed to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the bar association says that since mid-March some 40,000 people, including asylum seekers and unaccompanied children, have been expelled at border processing centers under new administration policies that flout U.S. and international law.
"We are deeply concerned by the expulsion of more than 40,000 people, including unaccompanied children and asylum seekers, under new policies during the COVID-19 pandemic," writes the bar association, noting that it has 24,000 members hailing "from all parts of our nation."
"Other nations have ensured that migration restrictions related to the coronavirus contain humanitarian exceptions for protected groups while protecting public health with alternatives such as medical tests or quarantines," states the letter, which was issued on Wednesday to the Trump administration.
"However," the letter says, "the United States has failed to implement such measures and, instead, is turning virtually all migrants away at the northern and southern U.S. borders in the name of protecting the U.S. against the further spread of COVID-19."
On average, people who have crossed the U.S.-Mexico border have been expelled in just 96 minutes, the bar association adds in the letter, which contains 21 footnotes and made arguments about how applicable law and policy should be handled.
At the same time, the U.S. Border Patrol has been turning away migrants at the nation's southern border without an individualized assessment of the person's possible asylum claims, despite CDC regulations that include a "humanitarian exception" to the agency's March 20 "limitation" order that, according to the bar association's letter, prohibited "certain non-citizens" from entering the U.S. from Mexico and Canada "purportedly" to restrict COVID-19 spread.
The letter explains that "the CDC [applicable] regulations include an exception to the entry limitation on 'humanitarian' grounds," but DHS "has interpreted the CDC's orders as permitting it to turn migrants away without an individualized assessment—and, as a result, it has admitted only two asylum seekers in the two months following the first [March-issued] order."
The letter also states that "in March and April alone, the U.S. expelled 899 unaccompanied children" at the borders.
Specifically, the letter, which was forwarded to numerous U.S. senators and representatives, urges that the CDC March order be withdrawn and that the administration restore "critical humanitarian protections" for asylum seekers and unaccompanied children "in compliance with U.S. and international law."
It also says that two months after the CDC's March 20 order, "as much of the U.S. began to reopen, the CDC nonetheless extended the order indefinitely."
"Both orders state that they draw their authority from 42 U.S.C. § 265, which permits limiting persons or property from entering the U.S. where there is 'serious danger of the introduction' of a disease into the United States from another country," says the letter, which is signed by the chairs of the bar association's Immigration & Nationality Law Committee, International Human Rights Committee and Task Force on the Rule of Law. "However," it says, "the virus already has been introduced into the U.S., which has seen more deaths caused by COVID-19 than any other country in the world."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250