Closed Down and Under Economic Pressure, NY Gym Owners Ramp Up Bid to Challenge COVID-19 Orders
The suit argues the fitness center and other gyms have been forced to close their operations, "depriving them of their liberty and property interests without due process."
July 10, 2020 at 03:35 PM
4 minute read
New York gyms are ramping up legal pressure against coronavirus-spurred restrictions that have forced their doors to stay closed for months on end.
An upstate New York fitness center on Thursday filed a state-level class action lawsuit challenging a series of executive orders ordering gyms and fitness centers to remain closed. The lawsuit aims for a judicial declaration that the orders, from Gov. Andrew Cuomo, are unconstitutional under the equal protection clause and the due process clause.
Litigation and other similar lawsuits reflect boiling frustration from businesses still not allowed to bring back their operations under the state's reopening plan. Nearly every part of the state is now in the fourth and final stage of Cuomo's reopening plan, but gyms are not listed among the businesses allowed to reopen in that phase.
The lawsuit says the upstate New York fitness center and similarly situated businesses have lost hundreds of millions in revenue and laid off a minimum of 70,000 employees statewide.
The class representative in the suit is Thousand Island Fitness Center in Jefferson County. The fitness center, according to the lawsuit, will permanently shut its door if it does not open immediately.
They are represented by James Mermigis from The Mermigis Law Group.
Mermigis, in an interview Friday, argued that gyms have been singled out and said many are faced with going out of business. Mermigis noted he would not have brought the suit earlier on in the pandemic, but said the coronavirus crisis has waned in New York.
Jason Conwall, a spokesman for Cuomo, issued a statement saying infections are spiking in many other states and the governor's actions are "wholly consistent" with the powers given to him by state lawmakers.
"Every public opinion survey has shown an overwhelming majority of New Yorkers support our re-opening approach," he said in the statement. "I understand some people aren't happy—but better unhappy than sick or worse."
The suit argues the fitness center and other gyms have been forced to close their operations, "depriving them of their liberty and property interests without due process." The litigation says the state continues to govern "impartially and arbitrarily" by ordering gyms to remain closed but allowing personal care businesses like tattoo parlors and salons to open.
It states that the Thousand Island Fitness Center and other gyms can provide their service in a sanitary and socially distanced environment.
An athletic club in central New York, also represented by Mermigis, filed a lawsuit earlier this month over the mandates forcing gyms to close.
In that suit, the Aspen Athletic Club argued Cuomo did not provide any procedural due process before issuing lockdown orders. The litigation says the athletic club operates four gyms throughout Onondaga County and employs 160 county residents.
Both lawsuits pointed to Cuomo's comments about demonstrators who had gathered in large crowds to protest the killing of Black Americans by police. The third-term governor has expressed support for the demonstrations.
"The only conclusion you draw from that is that thousands of people can march together throughout the State and there is no public health issue for marches, but someone who wants to open their gym with CDC safety guidelines is endangering the public," the lawsuit from the Aspen Athletic Club reads.
Meanwhile, Plasse Strength & Fitness filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The business is a personal training facility where people are at least six to 12 feet apart and customers are inside for no more than an hour at a time, according to the litigation.
"There is no rational basis why the plaintiff's business should remain closed while other businesses, such as nail salons and tattoo parlors, and other indoor businesses have been allowed to reopen," the lawsuit reads.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250