Long Island Lawmaker Proposes Bill That Would Allow New Yorkers Over 75 to Opt Out of Jury Duty
The proposal is sponsored by state Sen. James Gaughran, D-Suffolk, who said the issue was raised to him through a constituent. The person had been served with a jury notice, but was concerned about being around people due to the coronavirus pandemic, said the Long Island Democrat.
July 13, 2020 at 04:11 PM
3 minute read
A New York state bill would allow people to opt out of jury duty if they are over 75 years old or have an underlying health condition that puts them in danger of severe illness from the coronavirus.
The proposal is sponsored by state Sen. James Gaughran, D-Suffolk, who said the issue was raised to him through a constituent. The person had been served with a jury notice, but was concerned about being around people due to the coronavirus pandemic, said the Long Island Democrat.
Under the legislation, a person would be excused from jury service if they are older than 75 years old. A person with an underlying health condition could also opt out of serving if they submit a letter from a health care provider, according to the legislation filed late last month.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says the risk of severe illness from the coronavirus goes up with age among adults and the highest risk for severe illness is among people 85 years old and older.
People with certain underlying medical conditions are at a raised risk for severe coronavirus illness too, according to the agency.
The intensity of the crisis and the number of coronavirus deaths has fallen significantly since the height of New York's peak, but hundreds continue to test positive for the virus on a daily basis statewide.
Statewide data shows about 25,000 COVID-19 deaths in New York, the majority of which came from people 70 years old or older.
Gaughran described the grand jury bill as a common-sense measure, saying the health and safety of New Yorkers has to be put in front. He said the legislation only gives certain people the option of being excused from jury duty, but does not prevent them from serving if they wish.
The legislation would take effect immediately if passed. It would also expire and be repealed beginning April 2021 if it's signed into law.
Meanwhile, state Chief Judge Janet DiFiore said grand jurors are reporting for service and were being empaneled Monday in every judicial district outside New York City.
Summonses are also being mailed to prospective grand jurors in New York City this week, something that's leading up to commencing grand jury proceedings in the city starting Aug. 10, she said.
"And we have retrofitted dozens of courtrooms and installed plexiglass barriers in strategic locations to ensure safe personal distancing, and we will continue to work with the district attorneys' offices, the defense bar and our own epidemiologist to continuously assess, and minimize, any public health risks that could be presented," DiFiore said Monday.
Lucian Chalfen, a state court spokesman, has said persons who serve on grand juries would be physically spaced, but the specifics on that will vary depending on a building's layout.
READ MORE:
Grand Jury Summonses Will Be Sent Out as Phase Three Begins for NYC Courts
New York State Bill Would Require Police Officers to Carry Liability Insurance
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250