NY Steps Up Enforcement of Quarantine Mandate for Certain Interstate Travelers
Last month, New York required people entering the state to quarantine for 14 days if they are coming from states with significant coronavirus spread.
July 14, 2020 at 06:06 PM
4 minute read
Aiming to bolster quarantine enforcement, Gov. Andrew Cuomo says air travelers from states with significant coronavirus spread will have to provide their contact information or face a $2,000 fine.
Besides the fine, air travelers who refuse to give the information can be brought to a hearing and ordered to complete mandatory quarantine, said the third-term governor Monday.
"We can't be in a situation where we have people coming from other states in the country bringing the virus," the third-term Democrat said.
It's unclear if the intensified enforcement of the quarantine mandates will lead to new legal challenges.
Last month, New York required people entering the state to quarantine for 14 days if they are coming from states with significant coronavirus spread.
The move was codified in an executive order, which stipulated that a violation of a quarantine or isolation order could lead to a $10,000 civil penalty.
The order applies to people traveling from states with a positive test rate that is more than 10 per 100,000 residents, or a state that exceeds a 10% positivity rate, over a seven-day rolling average.
As of Tuesday, the quarantine requirement applies to people coming to New York from 22 states across the nation, including Florida, California and Texas.
An emergency health order Monday says all travelers subject to the executive order must complete a travel form. The electronic form asks for their name, phone number, date of arrival in New York and their method of transportation into the state, among other information.
Mary Beth Quaranta Morrissey, an attorney who focuses on health and public health law, said the state's moves highlight the dynamic between public health protections and civil liberties. But, the efforts from the Cuomo administration are on sound legal ground.
"We're not operating under normal conditions," she said.
Cheryl Kraus, an attorney at Rivera Law, said public health orders have been used previously. But now, she said there's more attention to the state's moves because they impact more people and the response to the pandemic has been politicized.
When it comes to the travel forms, airlines will hand out the forms on the plane and they will also be available online, Cuomo said Monday.
"You must give officials at the airport your form, as to where you came from and where you're going, before you leave the airport," he said. It will be enforced at every airport in the state.
James Lytle, senior counsel at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, said a legal challenge solely over the asking of contact information would not be successful in court.
But the quarantine mandate could be tougher to defend in certain situations, he said. That could be a situation where a traveler from a designated state was forced to quarantine in New York, even though they came from a remote area with a low infection rate and were able to show they posed no risk, he said.
To safely quarantine, a person must not be in public and must have the ability to self-quarantine from others in the household as soon as symptoms develop, according to interim guidance from the state's Department of Health. It says food should be delivered to the person's quarantine quarters, too.
A federal lawsuit has challenged Cuomo's authority to require people to quarantine if they come to New York from certain states.
It was brought by an Arizona resident who planned to fly to New York to help pack up a home.
READ MORE:
|New York's Visitor Quarantine Order Draws Legal Challenge From Arizona Woman
|NY, NJ and Conn. Tell Visitors From States With High Infection Rate to Quarantine
|What We Can Learn From New York Mental Hygiene Law To Help Us Battle COVID-19: The State of Quarantine Law in New York and Why It Is Flawed
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWorld Mental Health Day: Acknowledging Pregnancy Loss in the Legal Industry
6 minute readFederal Judge Allows Centers to Promote Abortion 'Reversal' Protocol
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250